"This Is A Way To Get Some Straight Skinny" - Sen. Mike Gravel (D-AK)

Author Archive

Health Care Reform Twitter Feed

In Twitter Feed on December 21, 2009 at 11:10 am

Last night, Filibuster regulars Ben Goodman, Thomas Dec, Robert Bowen, and Robert Burack live tweeted as the US Senate voted to end debate on the Health Care Reform bill. Please note that each of these panelists are Democrats, and the feed is in chronological order.

robertbowen 25 Minutes until the Senate vote on cloture! Get excited because they have the 60!

ThomasCDec 20 minutes until the Senate cloture vote. Going to watch our 60 votes in action.

BenGoodman Waiting for Mitch McConnell to say “OUR LONG NATIONAL NIGHTMARE IS OVER” #hcr #doitforteddy

Click the read “read more” button below to follow the conversation.

Read the rest of this entry »

Did you miss: Lynne Tongerson

In Sunday Show Preview on December 13, 2009 at 6:54 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Tonight, join radio’s greatest political panel as we break down the week’s top stories and take your calls live! Plus, we’ll speak with Lynne Tongerson – an independent challenger to Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN).

Sarah Palin on Conan

In Video on December 12, 2009 at 1:44 pm

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, and author of the bestseller “Going Rogue”, showed up on NBC’s The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien Friday, where she read from William Shatner’s autobiography.

Did You Miss Meat & Potatoes?

In Uncategorized on December 6, 2009 at 10:31 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Jobs, Afghanistan, & Health Care:

We break them all down on tonight’s Filibuster!

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

This December: The War On Christmas

In Announcements on December 2, 2009 at 5:56 pm

Did You Miss Nancy Rosenblum, The 2009 Election Preview, & Daylight Saving Time?

In Sunday Show Preview on November 26, 2009 at 7:37 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND!

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND!

Recover from your wild Halloween with the fastest hour on radio! Listen as our cross-country panel tackled the week’s biggest political stories and took your calls live!

Are political parties good for America? Nancy Rosenblum, chair of the Department of Government at Harvard University, joined us to discuss partisanship in America and her new book “On The Side of Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship“.

Read the rest of this entry »

Did You Miss Last Week’s Show?

In Sunday Show Preview on October 25, 2009 at 6:26 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Join the panel for a rip-roaring hour of the latest from Washington, DC and beyond. Our political panel of students from around the country dissected the week’s top stories and took your calls live!

Did You Miss Rep. Michaud & “To The Fed, Phred!”?

In Uncategorized on October 11, 2009 at 9:26 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Listen to our talk with Rep. Mike Michaud (D-ME) and activist Phred Barnett (who wants a public audit of the FED). We also discussed President Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize, NASA bombing the moon, and the latest from the world of baseball!

Miss Last Week’s Show?

In Guests on September 28, 2009 at 11:37 am

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Former Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-MN) joined us to talk about a possible bid for Governor, and the best panel in political talk radio broke down the week’s stories and took your calls live!

Miss Sunday’s Show?

In Sunday Show Preview on September 27, 2009 at 1:54 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

It was a week of significant international and domestic developments – and the Filibuster team was on top of all the week’s stories. From the G20 to Iran, from Birthers to the EPA – we broke down all the latest news, while taking your calls live on air! Join the conversation every Sunday at 10pm EST on WeeklyFilibuster.com!

Did You Miss This Week’s Show?

In Sunday Show Preview on September 20, 2009 at 7:48 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Did you miss this week’s edition of the Filibuster? Don’t fret! You can catch up with the show on demand. Join the Filibuster team for the fastest hour in political talk: from Gov. Paterson’s defiant decision to run for re-election to Sen. Max Baucus’ health care bill, we broke down all of the week’s top stories.

Matt Cavedon Published On Fox News’ Website

In Announcements on September 16, 2009 at 4:05 pm

Who said that Fox News didn’t have good taste? I certainly didn’t. Conservative panelist Matt Cavedon’s article “West, Wilson Forget Free Speech Is a Responsibility” was published on Fox News’ website today.

Between Kanye West and Rep. Joe Wilson, Americans are finally starting to get it: free speech is a right to act responsibly, not a license for stupidity.

Last week, America saw its president called a “liar” in the middle of one of the most important speeches that he has made yet, on the floor of Congress, no less. That his accuser is a duly elected member of the House of Representatives made it almost embarrassing. Granted, it could always be worse: at least our politicians are still yelling and not throwing punches, but that’s hardly a sign that we have a civilized democracy.

Click here to read the rest of the article over at Fox News [dot] com!

Miss Our Attempts To Convince Joe Wilson & Kayne West To Stay Classy?

In Sunday Show Preview on September 13, 2009 at 9:34 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

The partisan battles of the summer are continuing to simmer into the Fall, as Rep. Wilson (R-SC) shouts “you lie!” at President Obama during his prime time push for Health Care Reform Wednesday night. We’ll also take a look at all the other stories making headlines this week, from Afghanistan to Glenn Beck. Join the best political team on radio for the fastest hour in political talk!

Miss Our Fall Season Kickoff?

In Sunday Show Preview on August 30, 2009 at 8:42 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

You’re heading back to college this week, and so is the Filibuster team! We’ll break down the week in politics.

Get ready to be informed of all the week’s issues, as our fall season of special guests and hot political topics kicks off. With insight and analysis from the greatest political panel, and engaging conversations with today’s newsmakers, you’re bound to be the most informed politico on your campus!

Programming note: because it’s the school year, we’re going back to our regular schedule of only broadcasting every Sunday night at 10pm ET.

Miss our Filibuster 100th Episode Bonanza?

In Wednesday Show Preview on August 15, 2009 at 2:29 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

It’s hard to believe we’ve come this far, it’s a true accomplishment that would only be a dream without our dedicated listeners. So we wanted to make this moment even greater by providing a show worth getting excited about!

Former GOP Congressman (R-CO) and 2008 Presidential Candidate Tom Tancredo joined to take on the issues of the day, as well as join our 100th episode celebration!

We’ll also spoke with former SNL cast member Victoria Jackson, whose comments about Barack Obama have stirred up quite some controversy.

We were joined by Sherrie Ellen, of the Traveling Psychics, who “connected” us with former Presidents Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy.

Miss Our “Town Hells” Hour?

In Uncategorized on August 12, 2009 at 9:29 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

All round the country, enraged protesters are crashing and disrupting town hall events staged by Democratic members of Congress in an attempt to push their agenda on health care reform. Due to the disruptions, arrests, and violence at many of these events – they’ve been dubbed “town hells” by the media. Our panel spends the hour looking at every angle of these events. What are the goals of the protesters? What are these so-called “death panels”? What chance does real health care reform have of succeeding? We answer those questions, and many more.

Did you miss Brian Moore?

In Guests on August 9, 2009 at 7:55 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Nationwide, angry protesters are bombarding health care town halls – often causing members of Congress to cancel the events. We spoke with 2008 Socialist Party Nominee Brian Moore about whether “Obamacare” meets his definition of socialism.. We also discussed the swearing in of Justice Sotomayor, and all of the week’s news.

We were also joined again by guest panelist Michael Worley of Barry University, the host of The Progressive Hour on WBRY-AM in Miami, and author of The Worley Blog who provided great insight on the latest in the Florida senate race.

Miss Sunday’s Show?

In Uncategorized on July 30, 2009 at 9:42 pm

Did you catch The Weekly Filibuster Sunday night?  We spoke about the “birther” movement, the Government’s billion dollar “Cash For Clunkers” program, and new developments out of Venezuela.

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Filibuster Summer Break

In Announcements on July 20, 2009 at 8:36 pm

considerations-to-make-before-installing-a-swimming-pool0

Did you catch Bob Barr?

In Uncategorized on July 9, 2009 at 1:01 am

LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

Did you catch our conversation with 2008 Libertarian Presidential Candidate and former GOP congressman Bob Barr?

We spoke to Congressman Barr about the ongoing Panetta-House Intelligence Committee CIA letter, cap-and-trade, and the future of the third party movement.  We also broke down the week in politics with the greatest panel in radio!

Miss Jesse Ventura & Sonny Landham?

In Guests on July 8, 2009 at 2:51 pm

CLICK HERE TO CATCH UP

Join us this Wednesday night at 10pm (ET) for the summer 2009 premiere of the Wednesday night edition of The Weekly Filibuster with special guest Former Minnesota Governor Jesse “The Body” Ventura (author of  “Don’t Start The Revolution Without Me!) and 2010 Kentucky Gubernatorial Candidate Sonny Landham (and 2008 Libertarian Senate Candidate) – to talk about what he’s been up to, and whether Obama’s policies are working for the average American.

And as always, we’ll take YOUR calls live and discuss the latest in politics with the greatest political panel in talk radio.

Stay tuned for more information on what’s shaping up to be a great episode!

Miss Alaskan GOP Chair Ruedrich On Palin?

In Independence Day on July 5, 2009 at 12:32 pm

CLICK TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

CLICK TO LISTEN ON DEMAND

The chair of the Alaskan Republican Party Randy Ruedrich joined us, and provided new details on Gov. Palin’s decision to step down from office.

We also discussed Vice President Joe Biden’s comments on Israel, Meghan McCain’s role in a new Republican Party, and what John Dickison contributed to America.

Filibuster In July: Big Guests, Big Topics

In Guests on June 29, 2009 at 3:22 pm

In July, The Weekly Filibuster is heating things up with: big names, big shows, big topics, and the greatest panel in political talk radio! Former Minnesota Gov. Jesse “The Body” Ventura and former Congressman (R-GA) and 2008 Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Bob Barr will join us. Also, Alaskan GOP Chair Randy Ruedrich will field questions on Palin’s sudden decision to resign as Governor, and a number of other special guests will join us – including the Boston Tea Party’s Todd Andrew Barnett.  And as always, we’ll tackle the big stories of the week and take your calls!

Stay tuned for more details! We’ve got a few other surprises up our sleeve.

Did You Miss Ari Ne'eman?

In Uncategorized on June 16, 2009 at 4:51 pm

Did you miss our roundtable with Ari Ne’eman, President of The Autistic Self Advocacy Network, about the politics of whether disability groups should be focusing on a cure or adaptability?

CLICK HERE TO CATCH THE SHOW!

This will be Ari’s second appearance on The Weekly Filibuster. He joined us on May 31st, 2009 to discuss his work and a recent profile in Newsweek magazine.

National Fist Bump Day

In Oddball on June 3, 2009 at 2:09 pm

From the website…

“On June 3rd, 2008, Barack Obama and his wife Michelle took part in what immediately became known as “the fist bump heard ’round the world.” Though it was an intensely personal and affectionate gesture of love and respect at a pivotal moment in Obama’s presidential campaign, it firmly placed the fist bump on the national stage.”

 

Did you catch Dodge Landesman & Liberty Dems?

In Guests on May 24, 2009 at 11:59 am

LISTEN ON DEMAND

Listen to Sunday’s archive for our chat with NYC Council candidate Dodge Landesman.

For more info regarding Landesman, head to his website or read this week’s New Yorker piece on him.

This week Liberty University disbanded its College Democrats group, claiming their mission is inconsistent with university values. The group’s secretary, Jan Dervish also joined us to talk about the controversy.

 

Sunday: State of the American Press

In Uncategorized on April 22, 2009 at 3:19 pm

Click Here To Listen Live Online!

wfpost2copy

Also …

Did you miss our interview with The Nation editor Katrina vanden Heuvel?

Click HERE to listen on demand!

Weekly Filibuster On Twitter

In Uncategorized on April 18, 2009 at 10:36 am

FOLLOW THE SHOW ON TWITTER HERE!

As you may know, each of the panelists have been on Twitter for quite some time.

Today we’re proud to present The Weekly Filibuster’s own Twitter account.

Follow us to recieve show updates, panelist commentary, news, and to give feedback on all things Filibuster.

Miss our special "Conservative Edition?"

In Uncategorized on January 18, 2009 at 7:35 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Did you hear Senior Republican panelist Matt Cavedon guest-moderate our special “conservative” edition of the Weekly Filibuster?  We heard from author and former Ron Paul economic advisor Peter Schiff, who predicted the economic crisis months and months before anybody else. Schiff has a new book out. Then, our special “Conservative Roundtable Retrospective” on the Bush presidency, with Republican panelist Jay Gobeil and guest panelist Duc Luu at Harvard University. Plus, a live report from Washington, DC, where Moderator Ben Goodman and Senior Democratic Panelist Tom Dec are gearing up for Tuesday’s festivities.

Live From DC: Inauguration Coverage

In Uncategorized on January 18, 2009 at 12:13 pm

Barack Obama’s Presidential Inauguration will be one of the most historic events in American history – so you know the Weekly Filibuster crew will be there with live wall-to-wall coverage.

Can’t make the trip yourself? Join us this Sunday and Monday at 10pm here at weeklyfilibuster.com for the inside scoop live from the Capitol. It’s the next best thing to being there.

And in true Weekly Filibuster fashion, you never quite know what’s going to happen – or which of the country’s political powerbrokers are going to show up.

The Politcs Of Krispy Kreme

In Uncategorized on January 16, 2009 at 3:19 pm

Popular doughnut maker Krispy Kreme, hoping to hop on the Obama Inauguration bandwagon by offering costumers a free doughnut this Tuesday, is facing a backlash from crazy pro-life groups.

“Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (NYSE: KKD) is honoring American’s sense of pride and freedom of choice on Inauguration Day, by offering a free doughnut of choice to every customer on this historic day, Jan. 20. By doing so, participating Krispy Kreme stores nationwide are making an oath to tasty goodies — just another reminder of how oh-so-sweet ‘free’ can be.”

Yes, it seems the problem is that the phrase freedom of choice (even when talking about doughnuts) “is a tacit endorsement of abortion rights on demand”.

So keep in mind, all you baby-killing chocolate iced glazed cruller eaters, that ” the next time you stare down a conveyor belt of slow-moving, hot, sugary glazed donuts at your local Krispy Kreme, you just might be supporting President-elect Barack Obama’s radical support for abortion on demand.” YOU WERE WARNED!

I always hear this argument about how the left is comprised of the “politically correct”. This goes a bit towards realizing that it is on both sides, and what is referred to by saying “politically correct” is the longstanding fight on both ideological sides over which words and phrases are used to describe and name things. The bailout is called the “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act” in order to make it sound more essential to our economic survival. Language on abortion is used to underline a particular side’s views, whether it is about “choice” or “life”. Words are powerful, bringing with them certain connotations and evoking certain feelings, so naturally there is going to be a fight picked over which words are used.

The “would be hilarious if it wasn’t so insane” press release from the American Life League, by clicking “read the rest”.

Read the rest of this entry »

Inauguration Speech Generator

In Uncategorized on January 16, 2009 at 11:44 am

His Third Strike

In Uncategorized on January 12, 2009 at 2:04 pm

From Dowd’s column Sunday: Asked by People magazine what moments from the last eight years he revisited most often, W. talked passionately about the pitch he threw out at the World Series in 2001: “I never felt that anxious any other time during my presidency, curiously enough.”

I think this speaks for itself.

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on January 11, 2009 at 11:00 pm

The ongoing violence in the Gaza Strip, retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Karen Kwiatkowski, and what the death of Oscar Grant tells us about the future of Black America.

Plus, a tribute to one year of The Weekly Filibuster.

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

SNL – Roland Burris Cold Open

In Uncategorized on January 11, 2009 at 12:35 pm

$50 Billion Bread

In Uncategorized on January 10, 2009 at 8:46 pm

CNN: Zimbabwe’s central bank will introduce a $50 billion note — enough to buy just two loaves of bread — as a way of fighting cash shortages amid spiraling inflation. The country’s acting finance minister, Patrick Chinamasa, made the announcement in a government gazette released Saturday. Although Chinamasa did not give the date on which the $50 billion and new $20 billion notes would come into circulation, an official at the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe said the notes would be distributed to all banks by the end of Monday. Zimbabwe is grappling with hyperinflation now officially estimated at 231 million percent, and its currency is fast losing its value. As of Friday, one U.S. dollar was trading at around ZW$25 billion. When the government issued a $10 billion note just three weeks ago, it bought 20 loaves of bread. That note now can purchase less than half of one loaf.

If Your State Was A Country, By GDP

In Uncategorized on January 10, 2009 at 7:52 pm

Back To Basics

In Uncategorized on January 5, 2009 at 1:37 pm

With the new Congress being sworn in today, Eve Fairbanks over at The New Republican previews why the GOP caucus is likely to swing even farther to the right:

You would not expect House conservatives, dwindled in numbers and without even the consoling possibility of filibusters, to be relishing the prospect of 2009. But purist right-wingers in the House are oddly happy these days. That’s because they, like many outcast peoples, have discovered in their folklore their own Little Bighorn, a tale of resistance that gives them pride and hope.

If House Republicans push back on the proposed stimulus plan – not objecting to it completely, but acting as the party that says “you can’t have everything, here’s what’s wasteful” – they can score a great deal politically. This is, afterall, what we’ve been constantly hearing: the GOP has to go back to its roots.

Miss Last Night's Show?

In Uncategorized on January 5, 2009 at 12:01 am

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

We discussed the violence in the Gaza strip, the ongoing Senate dramas, Bill Richardson, Tim Kaine, and counted down the top 20 political moments of 2008!

Lock-Step On Israel

In Uncategorized on January 3, 2009 at 3:22 am

Glenn Greenwald over at Salon.com:

Is there any other significant issue in American political life, besides Israel, where (a) citizens split almost evenly in their views, yet (b) the leaders of both parties adopt identical lockstep positions which leave half of the citizenry with no real voice?  More notably still, is there any other position, besides Israel, where (a) a party’s voters overwhelmingly embrace one position (Israel should not have attacked Gaza) but (b) that party’s leadership unanimously embraces the exact opposite position (Israel was absolutely right to attack Gaza and the U.S. must support Israel unequivocally)? Does that happen with any other issue?

Comments – Jump In!

In Uncategorized on January 1, 2009 at 5:02 pm

Everyday, great discussions happen here at the Weekly Filibuster blog. Right now, for example, some of the topics include:

  • Whether Blago senate apointee Ronald Burris should/will ever make it to the Senate.
  • The conflict in the Gaza strip.
  • Whether we do great things as a nation, or individually.

We’re going to continue these, and other great conversations throughout the year. Make sure to get in on the discussion by posting a comment on any blog post. It’s easy, allows you to voice your opinion, and will make reading this blog all the more fun!

NYT Annual Quiz

In Uncategorized on January 1, 2009 at 2:54 pm

If you’re feeling up to it, Ben Schott provides “one hundred and eighteen questions, and a fiendish election table, on the incidents, accidents, hints and allegations that defined 2008.”

Should Auld Acquaintance Be Forgot

In Uncategorized on December 31, 2008 at 6:20 pm

Continuing war. Economic collapse. Global threats. Dilution of values. Natural disasters leading to poverty and suffering.

It can all get pretty heavy. Earlier this year, Bill Maher remorsed about the country’s seeming lack of ability to do “great things”. I agreed wholeheartedly. Then we elected Barack Obama.

It’s a new year – a new possibility. The first one hundred days of a presidency are usually the most productive, and I’m excited to see what is going to get accomplished. It’s just going to be nice to finally have a President that asks us to sacrifice something – to be better as a collective whole. Because, if we learned anything in 2008, it was that we’re all in this together.

Greatest Political Press Conference Ever

In Uncategorized on December 30, 2008 at 5:42 pm

Feel free to castigate the appointor but don’t lynch the appointor.

- Gov. Rod Blagojevich, At Press Conference On His Senate Appointment of Roland Burris

This guy is shameless.

Blago Makes Senate Pick

In Uncategorized on December 30, 2008 at 3:30 pm

Embattled Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich will announce at 3pm today that he’s chosen former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris as his choice to fill the Senate seat vacated by President-Elect Barack Obama. There have already been reports that Harry Reid and top Senate Democrats are going to block the appointment, wanting to avoid anything that even looks tainted (anybody that has been appointed by Gov. Blagojevich). A couple of thoughts:

  • Burris is certainly qualified for the position. Formerly the State Comptroller and Attorney General. The guy started running for the seat when Ronald Reagan was President.
  • If Senate Democrats block Burris, it could create some serious problems with African-American voters in Illinois, a huge number of Democrats in the state, who were looking for an African-American to fill Obama’s seat.
  • Why is Burris tainted as well? So what if he’s Blagojevich’s appointee. He’s highly qualified and would be the fourth African-American senator. Doesn’t blocking him create an unnecessary headache for Illinois and Senate Democrats? You’re down one more vote in the Senate (most likely during the entirety of Obama’s first 100 days), you further throw the Illinois Democratic Party into further chaos, and you reject an otherwise fine appointee.

Either way, corks are being popped at the Illinois GOP headquarters.

GOP's Success In Minority Outreach Continues

In Uncategorized on December 30, 2008 at 12:08 am

The Chip Saltsman debacle continues. Too bad Jesse Helms isn’t with us anymore, he might have done a less offensive job conducting minority outreach for the GOP.

Today on MSNBC, anchorwoman Tamron Hall talked with Kate Obenshain, vice president of Young America’s Foundation. Obenshain defended the song, calling it “a parody.”

HALL: Well let me tell you this — if someone referred to me as “Tamron Hall the Magic Negro Anchor Lady,” I would never see it as anything funny or amusing.

HALL: You’re not going to win a lot of people over calling them ‘Magic Negros.’”

Ethics Committee Seat A Hot Potato

In Uncategorized on December 29, 2008 at 4:17 pm

Kagro X, over at the under-visited Congress Matters, details the mad dash among House Members to either: remove themselves from the House Ethics Committee, or not be tasked with filling a seat on the House Ethics committee.

It’s not exactly breaking news that Members hate to be asked to serve on the committee … Go too hard on a colleague’s conduct and you risk their anger and thus your effectiveness. Go too easy, and you risk the public’s trust and thus your job.

Add to that the fact that the committee will continue its investigation of House Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Charlie Rangel when the 111th congress convenes. The (likely) new chair will be Massachusettes Rep. William Delahunt, the only Democrat on the 110th Congress’ Ethics Committee who can’t cite term limits as a reason for leaving.

If Delahunt is named chair, Pelosi must find other Democrats she can strong-arm into serving on the panel, which will continue to review any new allegations against Rangel, or the existing charges if the current committee does not finish its work and issue an initial report on its findings. Any choice Pelosi makes will be analyzed for any Rangel implications. If the member is African-American, that could be viewed as an attempt to help Rangel, even if Pelosi tries to sell it as a way to fill Tubbs Jones’ old post with another African American.

Russian Professor Predicts US Demise

In Uncategorized on December 29, 2008 at 12:45 pm

Russian professor Igor Panarin predicts this is what the US will look like after falling apart in 2010. His prediction has been pushed forward by the Kremlin, and they’ve got him giving a couple interviews daily.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces — with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on December 28, 2008 at 2:30 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Miss our exclusive talk with former McCain campaign manager Rick Davis, Dan Barker of “Freedom From Religion”, and Jamilla El-Shafei of ShoeBush.org? Click above to check out the show.

How Iceland Collapsed

In Uncategorized on December 27, 2008 at 2:20 pm

A fascinating post-mortem look at Iceland’s economy.

Khalid Aziz, chairman of the hospice trust, says he didn’t think twice back in 2005 when Icelanders bought the local bank. “With the globalization of markets,” he says, “everybody owns everything these days, don’t they?”

I'll Admit, Conservatives Love America More

In Uncategorized on December 27, 2008 at 12:29 am

Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times:

I don’t love America. That’s what conservatives are always telling liberals like me. Their love, they insist, is truer, deeper and more complete. Then liberals, like all people who are accused of not loving something, stammer, get defensive and try to have sex with America even though America will then accuse us of wanting it for its body and not its soul. When America gets like that, there’s no winning.

But I’ve come to believe conservatives are right. They do love America more. Sure, we liberals claim that our love is deeper because we seek to improve the United States by pointing out its flaws. But calling your wife fat isn’t love. True love is the blind belief that your child is the smartest, cutest, most charming person in the world, one you would gladly die for. I’m more in “like” with my country.

I still think conservatives love America for the same tribalistic reasons people love whatever groups they belong to. These are the people who are sure Christianity is the only right religion, that America is the best country, that the Republicans have the only good candidates, that gays have cooties.

I wish I felt such certainty. Sure, it makes life less interesting and nuanced, and absolute conviction can lead to dangerous extremism, but I suspect it makes people happier. I’ll never experience the joy of Hannity-level patriotism. I’m the type who always wonders if some other idea or place or system is better and I’m missing out. And, as I figured out shortly after meeting my wife, that is no way to love.

Chip Saltsman's RNC Chair Campaign Gets Off To A Great Start

In Uncategorized on December 26, 2008 at 11:13 pm

Chip Saltsman kicks off his campaign for RNC chair smoothly:

RNC candidate Chip Saltsman’s Christmas greeting to committee members includes a music CD with lyrics from a song called “Barack the Magic Negro,” first played on Rush Limbaugh’s popular radio show.

Liberals everywhere should be praying that this idiot gets the RNC chairmanship. Chip has clearly shown he can’t deftly handle being chairman of the party opposite Barack Obama. American’s like Barack Obama – a lot – and being a bigot won’t help Chip’s party win votes they don’t already have. Chip has loads of political experience too – you know, working for the third place Republican candidate who thinks the world is six thousand years old. That’s the kind of innovative thinking that’s going to bring the Republican Party back from the political graveyard.

But to be fair, let’s post Chip’s defense:

Saltsman said he meant nothing untoward by forwarding what amounts to a joke more at Ehrenstein’s expense than at Obama’s.

“Paul Shanklin is a long-time friend, and I think that RNC members have the good humor and good sense to recognize that his songs for the Rush Limbaugh show are light-hearted political parodies,” Saltsman said.

Because “Barack the Magic Negro” sounds rather “lighthearted”? Let’s continue to ponder why the GOP’s share of the black vote is almost non-existent.

Chip does deserve some credit. At least he’s managed not to insult Hispanic voters, who are only going to continue to grow as a critical swing voting block – a block the Republican Party still has a chance in hell at winning over.

The CD, called “We Hate the USA,” lampoons liberals with such songs as “John Edwards’ Poverty Tour,” “Wright place, wrong pastor,” “Love Client #9,” “Ivory and Ebony” and “The Star Spanglish banner.”

Oh, shit.

The War On Terror's Little Blue Pill

In Uncategorized on December 26, 2008 at 6:00 pm

The Washington Post:

The Afghan chieftain looked older than his 60-odd years, and his bearded face bore the creases of a man burdened with duties as tribal patriarch and husband to four younger women. His visitor, a CIA officer, saw an opportunity, and reached into his bag for a small gift.

Four blue pills. Viagra.

“Take one of these. You’ll love it,” the officer said. Compliments of Uncle Sam.

The enticement worked. The officer, who described the encounter, returned four days later to an enthusiastic reception. The grinning chief offered up a bonanza of information about Taliban movements and supply routes — followed by a request for more pills.

Seems like the surge is working.

Generous Christians Are Poor Christians

In Uncategorized on December 26, 2008 at 1:02 pm

As the Pope warns in his annual Christmas message that the world is headed toward ruin if selfishness prevails over solidarity during hard economic times…

Christianity Today Reports:

But this may actually be the best time for an emerging study that delivers the bad news. Over the next few months or years, as our economy travels down a long road of recovery, our neighbors may need much more assistance than we’ve grown accustomed to providing. And like skyrocketing home prices, the lack of generosity among American Christians is a trend that cannot continue without doing serious harm.

The median annual giving for an American Christian is actually $200, just over half a percent of after-tax income. About 5 percent of American Christians provide 60 percent of the money churches and religious groups use to operate. (It’s these people who skew the average.) “A small group of truly generous Christian givers,” say Passing the Plate’s authors, “are essentially ‘covering’ for the vast majority of Christians who give nothing or quite little.” In addition, America’s biggest givers—as a percentage of their income—are its lowest income earners.

In fact, in absolute terms, the poorest Christians give away more dollars than all but the wealthiest Christians. We see the pattern in recent history as well: When Americans earned less money following the Great Depression, they gave more. When income went up, they began to give less of it away.

My Person Of The Month

In Uncategorized on December 26, 2008 at 9:03 am

Tim DeChristopher, 27, University of Utah Economics Student

Salt Lake Tribune:

He didn’t pour sugar into a bulldozer’s gas tank. He didn’t spike a tree or set a billboard on fire. But wielding only a bidder’s paddle, a University of Utah student just as surely monkey-wrenched a federal oil- and gas-lease sale Friday, ensuring that thousands of acres near two southern Utah national parks won’t be opened to drilling anytime soon.

DeChristopher On Democracy Now!:

I started off, actually, at a final exam at the university and went straight from there down to the BLM office. And I saw some protesters walking back and forth outside, and I knew that I wanted to do more than that and that this kind of injustice demanded a higher level of disruption. And so, I just decided that I wanted to go inside and cause a bigger disruption.

And from there, I found it really easy to get inside and become a bidder, and went inside and was in the auction room. And once I was in there, I realized that any kind of speech or disruption or something like that wasn’t going to be very effective, but I saw pretty quickly that I could have a pretty major impact on the way this worked. And it just took me a little bit of time to build up the courage to do that, knowing what the consequences would be. And so, I started bidding and started driving up the prices for some of the oil companies. And throughout that time, I knew that I could be doing more and could really set aside some acres to really be protected. And so, then I started winning bids and disrupting it as clearly as I could.

The back-story on the land sale:

Well, basically, the Bush administration was trying to rush through this auction as quickly as possible to get it done before Obama took office, because they knew that it wouldn’t be acceptable under any other administration other than Bush and Cheney. And so, they just circled vast swaths of southern Utah. Their initial announcement, they included pieces of property that had houses on them in Moab and included property that they didn’t even have rights to drill in or they didn’t have rights to sell off and included a lot of areas around national parks. And so, they rushed through the process and didn’t have time to do adequate environmental impact statements, didn’t have time to take an adequate amount of public comment or even input from other federal agencies. And there was a big battle with the National Park Service, because they were upset over a lot of areas that were included in there. But luckily, they also didn’t have time to make sure that all the bidders were bonded, which is how I got in so easily.

An act of civil disobedience that is to be applauded.

The Bush Administration however, hasn’t stopped with selling off national park land to oil compaines. The head of the EPA, Stephen Johnson, recently wrote a memo declaring “that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant to be regulated when approving power plants.” Sen. Boxer (D-CA) has (correctly) called the memo “blatantly illegal” in a letter to AG Mukasey.

Is anything sacred?

Merry Christmas

In Uncategorized on December 25, 2008 at 12:51 am

From all of the Filibuster crew, we wish each of you a Merry Christmas!

Regular blogging continues Friday, and we’re [as always] live this Sunday.


Politics & Poetry: Caroline Edition

In Uncategorized on December 25, 2008 at 12:39 am

Hell,

I’d be fine with Caroline

Fillin’ Hillary’s

Soon to be

Secretary of State seat

But whatever Obama wills

He’d better do it toot sweet

- Klytus, Salon.Com

Obama Holiday Address

In Uncategorized on December 24, 2008 at 1:32 pm

Forgiving George

In Uncategorized on December 24, 2008 at 11:23 am

Evolution In The Muslim World

In Uncategorized on December 24, 2008 at 12:12 am

Salman Hameed in Science via Sullivan:

…although the last couple of decades have seen an increasing confrontation over the teaching of evolution in the United States, the next major battle over evolution is likely to take place in the Muslim world (i.e., predominantly Islamic countries, as well as in countries where there are large Muslim populations). Relatively poor education standards, in combination with frequent misinformation about evolutionary ideas, make the Muslim world a fertile ground for rejection of the theory. In addition, there already exists a growing and highly influential Islamic creationist movement (1). Biological evolution is still a relatively new concept for a majority of Muslims, and a serious debate over its religious compatibility has not yet taken place. It is likely that public opinion on this issue will be shaped in the next decade or so because of rising education levels in the Muslim world and the increasing importance of biological sciences.

That makes the momentary front-runner for the Republican nomination in 2012, if you’re to believe the CNN poll, right in line with the Muslim world. That’d be Huckabee, by the way. Palin, another evolution-denier, is the runner up.

Pardon Me, Mr. President

In Uncategorized on December 23, 2008 at 10:57 pm

Earlier today, President Bush pardoned nineteen individuals and commuted one sentence. Reed Raymond Prior was convicted for the possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute – Charles Winter for violating the Neutrality Act by helping the Jewish resistance in the Middle East in the 1940’s. The individuals with sentences either pardoned or commuted have committed a wide range acts. Since in office, George W. Bush has pardoned 191 people, and has commuted nine sentences (Scooter Libby’s among them). This may sound like an awful lot, but it’s really not – at least compared to our two prior presidents. Reagan granted clemency 409 times,  Clinton 459.

Shouldn’t we trust the judgment of each President to only pardon in deserving cases?

You might think so – but not even expected public outrage stopped President Clinton from pardoning Mark Rich – the corrupt financier whose ex-wife had donated to President Clinton’s library. Clinton didn’t have to worry about either public or political pressure, because the pardon was signed on his last day in office. Presidents have the power to pardon anyone they want  – which can include siblings (Rodger, anyone?) and political allies. While the Justice Department reviews all pardon applications, their recommendations are non-binding.

All of this leads us to the larger question: should a President be able to pardon anyone – for any reason?

Should Ford have showed mercy on Nixon – should he have ’spared’ the country?

Should Clinton have been able to pardon his brother and a laundry list of individuals on his last day of office?

My answer is conflicted – maybe yours isn’t. However, I propose the following:

1. A President loose the ability to pardon/commute exactly two months before his/her presidency ends. This would ensure there would be some pressure against pardoning undeserving individuals, but would not conflict with the election of the next President.

2. A President only have the ability to pardon/commute individuals who are approved by the Justice Department.

3. A President not have the ability to pardon/commute family members.

4. A President will hand out “Get Out Of Jail Free” cards to those pardoned/commuted. Just for kicks.

Pies & Rick Davis

In Uncategorized on December 21, 2008 at 11:35 pm

This Monday we’ll be talking with former McCain campaign manager Rick Davis for our December 18th show, and we want you to get involved by submitting a question for Rick.
Send your questions to: askrick@weeklyfilibuster.com
Ask about anything you’d like.
Just be sure to include your first name and home state.

Also,

Gene Amondson has extended an offer for christian Weekly Filibuster listeners. Christians should write to him here for a free copy of his excellent pie book, “Gene Amondson’s Mt. Rainier Pies Cookbook”.

Also, be sure to check out Gene’s website.

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on December 21, 2008 at 9:46 pm

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN!

We talked about the notorious Illinois Governor, talked with the RNC’s eCampaign Director, and caught up with the Prohibition Party’s 2008 Presidential Candidate.

The Brick Testament

In Uncategorized on December 21, 2008 at 12:32 pm

Behold! The entire Bible … in legos.

On Our Watch

In Uncategorized on December 21, 2008 at 12:20 am

Today there are more slaves than at any time in human history.” – E. Benjamin Skinner, Foreign Policy Magazine

Skinner’s piece in Foreign Policy was more shocking than it should be. It makes sense. There are more people alive than ever before, more globalization, more inequality than ever before.

But how? Is it that these things aren’t brought to our attention more often (the media devotes the time to frivolous stories), or is it that we just don’t care? Out of sight, out of mind.

“Slavery exists today on an unprecedented scale. In Africa, tens of thousands are chattel slaves, seized in war or tucked away for generations. Across Europe, Asia, and the Americas, traffickers have forced as many as 2 million into prostitution or labor. In South Asia, which has the highest concentration of slaves on the planet, nearly 10 million languish in bondage, unable to leave their captors until they pay off “debts,” legal fictions that in many cases are generations old.”

“For four years, I saw dozens of people enslaved, several of whom traffickers like Benavil actually offered to sell to me. I did not pay for a human life anywhere. And, with one exception, I always withheld action to save any one person, in the hope that my research would later help to save many more. At times, that still feels like an excuse for cowardice. But the hard work of real emancipation can’t be the burden of a select few. For thousands of slaves, grassroots groups … can help bring freedom. But, until governments define slavery in appropriately concise terms, prosecute the crime aggressively in all its forms, and encourage groups that empower slaves to free themselves, millions more will remain in bondage. And our collective promise of abolition will continue to mean nothing at all.”

Last Night's Show

In Uncategorized on December 8, 2008 at 12:22 am

The recording from BlogTalk seems to be unavailable. We’ll update you when the problem is solved.

The Politics Of Sex

In Uncategorized on October 30, 2008 at 5:34 pm

Via the New Yorker:

…evangelical Protestant teen-agers are significantly less likely than other groups to use contraception. This could be because evangelicals are also among the most likely to believe that using contraception will send the message that they are looking for sex. It could also be because many evangelicals are steeped in the abstinence movement’s warnings that condoms won’t actually protect them from pregnancy or venereal disease. More provocatively, Regnerus found that only half of sexually active teen-agers who say that they seek guidance from God or the Scriptures when making a tough decision report using contraception every time. By contrast, sixty-nine per cent of sexually active youth who say that they most often follow the counsel of a parent or another trusted adult consistently use protection.

Can we please start teaching comprehensive sex education?

Here’s a sensible middle ground:

Shelby Knox, who spoke at a congressional hearing on sex education earlier this year, occupies a middle ground. She testified that it’s possible to “believe in abstinence in a religious sense,” but still understand that abstinence-only education is dangerous “for students who simply are not abstaining.” As Knox’s approach makes clear, you don’t need to break out the sex toys to teach sex ed—you can encourage teen-agers to postpone sex for all kinds of practical, emotional, and moral reasons. A new “abstinence-plus” curriculum, now growing in popularity, urges abstinence while providing accurate information about contraception and reproduction for those who have sex anyway. “Abstinence works,” Knox said at the hearing. “Abstinence-only-until-marriage does not.”

And “red” state values?

In 2004, the states with the highest divorce rates were Nevada, Arkansas, Wyoming, Idaho, and West Virginia (all red states in the 2004 election); those with the lowest were Illinois, Massachusetts, Iowa, Minnesota, and New Jersey. The highest teen-pregnancy rates were in Nevada, Arizona, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas (all red); the lowest were in North Dakota, Vermont, New Hampshire, Minnesota, and Maine (blue except for North Dakota). “The ‘blue states’ of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic have lower teen birthrates, higher use of abortion, and lower percentages of teen births within marriage,” Cahn and Carbone observe. They also note that people start families earlier in red states—in part because they are more inclined to deal with an unplanned pregnancy by marrying rather than by seeking an abortion.

On Tuesday…

In Video on October 30, 2008 at 5:24 pm

You can vote however you like.

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on October 26, 2008 at 9:55 pm

Click here to listen as the panel talks Senate races, Palin’s wardrobe, and all the latest from the campaign trail.

Democratic Convention Coverage

In Uncategorized on August 27, 2008 at 8:41 am

Share your live reactions with the Weekly Filibuster, immediately following each night’s speeches. We’ll be broadcasting LIVE from the 2008 Democratic Convention in Denver! Our team will provide immediate analysis on all of the night’s events, as well as TAKE YOUR CALLS LIVE.

Be sure to tune in, as we’ll likely be chatting with special guests from the convention floor….

Weekly Filibuster 2008 Democratic National Convention Coverage
Wednesday Night 11pm – Midnight Eastern
Thursday Night 11pm – Midnight Eastern
Friday Night 10pm-11pm Eastern

Edwards Admits To Affair

In Uncategorized on August 8, 2008 at 3:14 pm

Just imagine this coming out if he was the nominee.

Never Surrender

In Uncategorized on August 7, 2008 at 10:48 pm

Via Entertainment Weekly:

EW: Who controls the remote at home, you or Cindy?

McCain: Sometimes I win the arm wrestling contest, but foolishly she continues to try to assert her control over the remote. This is a battle that will continue for a long time. But there are shows we agree on. We like the reruns of “Seinfeld.” I really like “Curb Your Enthusiasm.” I kind of like “Dexter,” too, although it certainly has a macabre side to it. I’ll tell you that Cindy likes “Big Love” — I haven’t watched it much, but she enjoys that. And I like The Wire” a lot, too. That’s a great show.

These little things are a glimpse into a candidate’s psyche? 100 years, anyone?

St. Paul Protests

In Uncategorized on August 4, 2008 at 10:28 am

From truckers to conspiracy theorists, it looks like every cause is going to attempt to grab the national spotlight when the Republican Convention comes to St. Paul in early September. We’re likely to not see the kind of widespread protests we saw at the 2004 convention, given that: the convention that year was held in New York City, it was at the height of the Iraq War, and this year’s election seems certain to be a gain for Democrats.

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on August 3, 2008 at 9:45 pm

Miss last night's show?

In Uncategorized on July 30, 2008 at 9:00 pm

Our show last night garnered media attention (Politico / PolitickerKY) yet again.  
Did you miss it?  Listen now!

CLICK HERE

TONIGHT: Sonny Landham / LP Political Director Sean Haugh

In Uncategorized on July 28, 2008 at 10:21 am

Tonight at 10pm EST, we’ll have a special Monday edition of “The Weekly Filibuster”. Sonny Landham himself will join us to give his first reaction to the Kentucky LP’s decision. Also, to comment on the Sonny Landham controversy and his party’s slow response will be Libertarian Party Political Director Sean Haugh. Check back here at 10pm to listen to the show live.

PolitickerKY’s political cartoon for the day:

Missed Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on July 27, 2008 at 9:26 pm

Catch up what on our conversations wit Ken Molleman, Rick Noriega, and more here.

Green Party Roundup

In Uncategorized on July 15, 2008 at 1:00 pm

The Green Party nominated two smart, principaled, and dynamic women of color for its presidential ticket this weekend: Cynthia McKinney and Rose Clemente. Take a look at Brenda Konkel’s “Faces Of The Green Party“, and find your state.

Another interesting caveot: McKinney was a congresswoman from Georgia. Between her candidacy and Barr’s, it will be interesting to watch which way the state of Georgia goes in November.

Ask A Conservative Panelist

In Uncategorized on July 15, 2008 at 12:00 pm

Matt: Why do the majority of poor counties in America vote Republican, and against their own economic interests? (Liberal Bias Italicized)

His response:

Either a) poor people, especially poor whites in the rural South, are stupid or b) poor people believe that economic growth is the best way to fight poverty and do not want government handouts.

Isn’t it amazing that the party of lawyers and academics who propose fanciful, government-run solutions to health care, education, welfare, job creation, low-income assistance, farm aid, and everything else under the sun cannot beat a party of preachers, doctors, and businessmen in America’s poorest counties?

A lot of people who have been on Medicare and lived in subsidized housing realize how awful of a state it tends to be in, and would hardly wish that federal programs become the primary means of welfare in this country. Many others may indeed have started working as a result of welfare reform in the 1990’s and may truly appreciate the dignity that comes from self-sustenance. Many of the working poor could also use a tax break, to be honest. Some might even want a business-friendly atmosphere so that they can become entrepreneurs of their own and rise up out of poverty.

Others are drawn by the GOP’s social and foreign policy stances, as many are quite deeply religious and do not believe that illegal immigration can keep up at the pace it’s been going without even less opportunities for people to get by.

The next time a Democrat whips out classism and accuses a Republican of serving the rich, ask yourself this: do Republicans support taxing one third of the average American’s income? Do Republicans support sending billions of dollars in tax money abroad when Americans are starving? Do Republicans support regulating job creators out of business? Do Republicans support more expensive and ineffective social programs?

Or do Republicans stand for a pro-business, small-government, pro-charity America where jobs exist and services are good?

Your thoughts?

Maureen Dowd's Bumper

In Uncategorized on July 15, 2008 at 10:36 am

Looks like the infamous New York Time’s columnist will have to remove the “Where Are We Going? And Why Are We In This Hand Basket?” bumper sticker from her Prius, as per a newly released Times memo:

They may not wear campaign buttons or themselves display any other insignia of partisan politics. They should recognize that a bumper sticker on the family car or a campaign sign on the lawn may be misread as theirs, no matter who in their household actually placed the sticker or the sign.

But seriously, what do you think Maureen Dowd drives? Does she take the Metro?

The Detroit Free Press On The Youth Vote

In Uncategorized on July 14, 2008 at 5:45 pm
Editorial Page editor Ron Dzwonkowski:

“It’s an odd thing, really, how so many in the generation that fights the wars take a pass on picking the people who start them. The generation that will be paying taxes for the most years abdicates on selecting the authors of tax policy. The kids who will be stuck with the bills don’t seem to care who runs them up … They may say the candidates never “connected with them.” Well, of course not. Candidates prefer connecting with people who vote. That’s why they work the senior centers instead of the gaming arcades and night clubs.”

As one of the young people Ron Dzwonkowski suggests doesn’t vote, it’s always disheartening to see the same tired meme of youth apathy constantly recycled. The problem hasn’t been that young people aren’t engaged in presidential elections, it’s that the choices previously offered were consistently disappointing. Another old white guy? And for many young people, myself included, George Bush has been our introduction to the presidency. The young are about idealism, which can be easily deflated by a politician winning on the crest of a strategy meant to bring out fear. Young people have finally found a candidate that inspires, excites, and engages them: Barack Obama. Everywhere I go, young voters are enthusiastic. This year will be one in which we see a massive increase in youth voting, and those who take our votes seriously. If there ever was a year for things to change, it’s 2008.

On The "New Yorker" Cover

In Uncategorized on July 14, 2008 at 4:37 pm

At first glance, I would have confused this for a cover of “National Review”. Take a look at the image that’s bound to get some considerable cable buzz today:

Shouldn’t the McCain campaign be most worried about this? If they let a vote against Obama become a vote for bigotry, they’ve lost. This cover advances that meme. It’s also suprising to see most of the more vile comments this cycle coming from the left: Ralph Nader and Jesse Jackson.

Vetting The Veeps: Mike Huckabee

In Uncategorized on July 14, 2008 at 4:04 pm

DC is buzzing with speculation over who Barack Obama and John McCain will choose to be their prospective Vice President. Each day the panel gives their thoughts on potential candidates, and rates them on a scale of 1-100 (100 being if Jesus or MLK joined the ticket). Based on the scores, we’ll have the Weekly Filibuster’s choices for VP in the coming weeks.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee:

Ben Goodman:

Pro – Religious conservatives are not the “hot demographic” in 2008, but John McCain will need to try and keep them from voting for someone like Bob Barr or Gene Amondson. He’s a seemingly straight talker that could do well in a debate against Hillary Clinton.

Con – It’s the economy, stupid.

The Veep Value: 45

Joshua Lambert:

Pro – McCain is just moderate enough so that he won’t have to worry about losing the center votes to Obama so he needs someone that’s fairly far to the right to bring back the conservatives that hate him. Huckabee would do just that and ensure that the Libertarian party isn’t a spoiler for the Republicans in 2008. He’ll unite the party a little bit more.

Con – He is uber conservative which might alienate the moderate votes that McCain is hoping to carry. And plus, he made himself look like a bit of a fool with this ad:

The Veep Value: 45

Read the rest of this entry »

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on July 14, 2008 at 12:26 am

Click here to listen to our interview with Mike Gravel and Joe Lauria about their new book Political Odyssey, and our talk with Gregory Levey about his book Shut Up, I’m Talking.

Miss Sunday's Show?

In Uncategorized on July 14, 2008 at 12:26 am

Click here to listen to our interview with Mike Gravel and Joe Lauria about their new book Political Odyssey, and our talk with Gregory Levey about his book Shut Up, I’m Talking.

Happy Fourth Of July

In Uncategorized on July 4, 2008 at 9:34 pm

fireworks

Everyone on the Weekly Filibuster crew hopes your 4th of July was filled with as much family, fireworks, and love of country as ours was. Here’s to America.

Vetting The Veeps: Kathleen Sebelius

In Veepstakes on July 3, 2008 at 2:39 pm

DC is buzzing with speculation over who Barack Obama and John McCain will choose to be their prospective Vice President. Each day the panel gives their thoughts on potential candidates, and rates them on a scale of 1-100 (100 being if Jesus or MLK joined the ticket). Based on the scores, we’ll have the Weekly Filibuster’s choices for VP in the coming weeks.

We start today with Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius:

Robert Bowen:

Pro - She’s a fairly liberal governor of a conservative state. Sam Brownback anyone? She clearly knows how to speak to moderates and average, blue-collar Americans that Obama has struggled with. She might make Missouri closer but I don’t see Obama winning there.

Con - Did anyone see her rebuttal to the State-of-the-Union? She is one of the most boring and uninspiring speakers I have ever heard. This is in addition to the fact that she’ll lose her home state (the polls from that will be embarassing to the campaign in the last few weeks). It will also do nothing to unite the party because moderates who supported Clinton will be pissed that they picked her and not Clinton. That will be true no matter who Obama picks, but especially if she picks another woman. Furthermore, she has no supporters nationally. I honestly don’t think she changes the electoral math at all (not the sign of a good VP candidate).

The Veep Value: 38

Matt Cavedon:

Pro - As a white woman governor of a red agricultural states, she could help get Clintonistas back in line behind Obama. She is known as a moderate, and is well-liked by independents and moderate Republicans, meaning she could bring Missouri, Iowa, possibly Kansas, Minnesota, and Wisconsin into Obama’s column.

Con - She brings absolutely nothing by way of extensive federal experience or foreign policy expertise to Obama’s campaign. Given that she is a socially and economically liberal governor of a moderate state, that doesn’t mean she can do anything in the highly-populated industrial and military swing states that will determine the election.

The Veep Value: 65

Ben Goodman:

Pro -  She’s white. She’s female. She brings executive experience as a governor of a red state, and could help secure a state like Iowa and help in Missouri.

Con - If Barack Obama is going to pick a woman, it needs to be Hillary Clinton. HRC supporters will see a Sebelius addition as a slap in the face. She’s not even likely to net her home state of Kansas.

The Veep Value: 53

Tom Dec:

Pro - Woman. White. Bi-partisan attitude/appeal.

Con - She won’t win any states – I think Barack Obama can win MO and IA without her – and I agree with Ben that if it is a woman it must be Hillary. She would be a poor choice.

The Veep Value: 42

Josh Lambert:

Pro - White woman.

Con - Who is she again? That’s what people will be asking. She’s a no namer everywhere but her state and outside the realm of political intellectuals, no one else has really heard of her.

The Veep Value: 39

Overall: 46.4

Vetting The Veeps: Bobby Jindal

In Veepstakes on July 1, 2008 at 5:26 pm

DC is buzzing with speculation over who Barack Obama and John McCain will choose to be their prospective Vice President. Each day the panel gives their thoughts on potential candidates, and rates them on a scale of 1-100 (100 being if Jesus or MLK joined the ticket). Based on the scores, we’ll have the Weekly Filibuster’s choices for VP in the coming weeks.

We start today with Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal:

Matt Cavedon:

Pro - He is a hardcore religious guy who will get the Southerners out to vote against abortion and homosexuality in favor of guns and, well, Southerners. Much though I’m guessing many Indians are Democrats, the simple fact that he’s on the ticket could also pull out a good number of Indians to the polls. They seem pretty untapped right now.

Con - He’s really young, highlighting McCain’s… maturity, and he’s not a businessman. Besides, the odds of McCain losing the South to BARACK OBAMA are slim to none.

The Veep Value: 45

Tom Dec:

Pro - Yes, he would help in that he will provide a refreshing breath of air to the white, old, conservatives that inhabit the Republican Party. He could potentially help to offset Obama’s advantage in terms of identity politics, and he would help win some of the conservatives that John McCain has had problems with.

Con - He would be a terrible pick because he is TOO young (only one year older than the constitutional limit) and would highlight McCain’s age, he doesn’t necessarily bring any economic credentials to the table, and I doubt he will help to really carry any extra states for the ticket.

The Veep Value: 39

Overall: 42

New Show Tonight At 10pm

In Uncategorized on June 28, 2008 at 9:40 pm

Don’t forget we’ll be live tonight at 10pm eastern. You can listen to the show by just bookmarking this website and returning here. We’ll be discussing all of the week’s top political news and taking your calls at 347-205-9993.

Just a note: we’re posting less than normal due to several factors. Much of the staff is very busy with other projects this particular week, we’re busy working to give the site a facelift, and we’re busy working on getting some very special guests on the program. We should be back to normal starting Monday.

Listen To Wednesday Night's Show

In Sunday Show Preview on June 25, 2008 at 9:00 pm

Listen here to catch up on Wednesday’s show, where we talked to former Massachusetts Governor Paul Cellucci and Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Wayne Root.

Wayne Root and Paul Cellucci Join Us Tonight

In Guests on June 25, 2008 at 5:25 pm

wayne root

Join us tonight at 10pm EST for the premiere of our summer “Wednesday Filibuster” show. We’ll be joined by Libertarian Party vice presidential candidate Wayne Root. He’ll drop by to talk with the panel about the Libertarian Party’s presidential ticket. We’ll also be joined by former Massachusetts Governor and ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci. As always, the best political panel in radio will debate and discuss the week’s hottest political topics. Join the conversation or ask Wayne a question by calling in at 347-205-9993. Just bookmark this page and return here shortly before the show to listen live.

Question Of The Day

In QOTD on June 24, 2008 at 5:47 pm

McCain adviser Charlie Black yesterday:

As would, Black concedes with startling candor after we raise the issue, another terrorist attack on U.S. soil. “Certainly it would be a big advantage to him,” says Black.

Do you agree? Would another terrorist attack on U.S. soil be a big advantage to McCain? Would it send voters flocking to the candidate with decades of national security experience? Would they blame McCain by proxy, for Bush’s failure to protect the nation …. and his making the country less safe by having increased anti-American sentiments in the Middle East?

Panelist Matt Cavedon:

Another terrorist attack would certainly be a boon for John McCain. A veteran who has made his career out of handling crises and providing moral leadership, McCain is the type of person people really do trust to answer the phone at 3 AM, as Hillary would have learned had she made it this far. Given his record of supporting unconditional dialogue between himself and leaders of Iran, Syria, and other rogue regimes, it is worth wondering whether Barack Obama would have begun air strikes against Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11 or if he would have sent a peace delegation to Kabul to attempt in vain to ask the Taliban politely to turn over al-Qaida.

Of course, there is another feasible way that Obama would react to an attack on the U.S. As I mentioned in yesterday’s response, Obama may be more a war hawk than we are being told. It is entirely possible that, as a snap reaction to danger, Obama would immediately send ground troops to Pakistan’s tribal regions to “root out terrorists.” How the tribespeople would take to a land invasion aiming to get “the bad guys” is anyone’s best bet, but my guess is not much more hospitably than Muqtada al-Sadr’s men did in Baghdad.

Whether or not McCain would make an ethical choice and truly prioritize long-term security that comes only from meaningful peace in the aftermath of another attack is also something of a mystery. After all, he wholeheartedly supported the baseless invasion of Iraq, and might take the next attack as an opportunity to “liberate” the Iranians from their elected government.

Most Americans, though, myself included, think for now that McCain would be more likely to listen to the wisdom of top military and intelligence officials and demand concrete evidence of a continued threat, then be willing to respond to it with all necessary force, than Obama. It’s something worth thinking about as we the people prepare to elect our next Commander-in-Chief.

Panelist Tom Dec:

If we were to have another terrorist attack on US soil, it would certainly be an advantage to McCain. Historically, the republicans have been the party of national security – when people are scared they tend to flock to them – and Sen. John McCain is a safe bet that he would be able to adequately handle the situation (whether you think it is the right way or not, he would be able to lead the country through it), and people would trust him. I think if there was to be a terrorist attack, McCain’s experience in national security would take the forefront, and Obama’s relative inexperience would also take the forefront, giving a massive advantage to McCain. I don’t think people would blame the Republican Party for an attack because if there was another terrorist attack, the first thing we would see is fearful people wanting a strong leader – not people pointing fingers. Since the time window between now and the election is so small, it would provide for people to vote based on their feelings – and fear. Can Barack Obama adequately handle a national security crisis? Absolutely. But the general public, I think, would give a large premium to the person who is a Vietnam veteran, and an experienced legislator in national security.

Following Bob Barr

In Commentary on June 24, 2008 at 3:06 pm

Since the Libertarian Convention back in May on C-SPAN, I’ve been following the Libertarian ticket very closely. Barr has been picking up some mainstream media coverage as of late: talk of him on CNN’s “The Situation Room”, his interview tomorrow on O’Reilly’s radio show, and his rumored appearance on ABC’s “This Week With An Ex-Clinton Staffer” this Sunday. A recent Insider Advantage poll shows Barr receiving 6% in Georgia, making McCain’s lead over Obama only a point. So far his coverage has only been as a potential “spoiler”, but we’ll see if this press translates into rising poll numbers and eventual votes. The Libertarian Party is doing a great job on ballot access, already on in thirty states. And as third parties know, getting on the ballot is half the battle. 

Just a note: we’re going to be joined by Libertarian Party Vice Presidential Nominee Wayne Root on tomorrow night’s show at 10pm. We’ll be taking your calls as well.

Veepstakes On MSNBC.Com

In Oddball on June 24, 2008 at 2:53 pm

veepstakes

There’s a cool new featured over at MSNBC’s website. Chuck Todd and David Greggory host an online Veepstakes game, where anyone can go and vote for who they think Obama and McCain’s running mates will be. It looks like Pawlenty will take it for McCain, but Obama’s choices still need to be whittled down.

Plouffe's Powerpoint

In Political News on June 24, 2008 at 1:41 pm

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s powerpoint to Clinton donors is making the rounds.

Haunting

In Commentary on June 24, 2008 at 2:49 am

Sullivan’s “Face of the Day” yesterday:

carla

French first lady Carla Bruni, at the Children’s Memorial in the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial.

The Fray

In Fray on June 23, 2008 at 8:52 pm

Pulled from the comments section, a reader disagrees with Brian Moore:

I agree that socialism hasn’t failed and hasn’t been given the opportunity in the US and the rest of the world. However I strongly disagree with his comments about Cuba and Fidel Castro. I don’t know if Cuba has full employment or not, but their wages are very low. Freedom of press and speech aren’t the only rights Cubans don’t have. They don’t have the freedom to travel or the right to own property either.

Anyways the main point I wish to make is that Cuba has a Communist economic system not a socialist economic system. In a communist system the state owns all property and runs all domestic businesses. In a socialist system the workers collectively and democratically own and run businesses. There is no ban on owning private property in a socialist economic system. Socialism is completely different from both Capitalism and Communism. Any society that is totalitarian and undemocratic cannot be socialist. For a society to become socialist there must be both political and economic democracy. While Cuba is less repressive than America, it isn’t democratic.

Your thoughts? The comment section is always open for discussion.

Karl Rove's Metaphor

In Commentary on June 23, 2008 at 5:29 pm

rove

On how Republicans should frame Barack Obama:

Even if you never met him, you know this guy. He’s the guy at the country club with the beautiful date, holding a martini and a cigarette that stands against the wall and makes snide comments about everyone who passes by.

Brilliant strategy, Karl (note the sarcasm). Interesting metaphor to use, especially since Barack Obama would likely never be let into many of the country clubs in this country. White women have a hard enough time getting in. If conservatives think they’re going to win this by making ridiculous attacks on Obama that aren’t related to policy – they’re delusional.

And, no Karl, I don’t know this guy. Along with most of America, I don’t have a membership at a country club. Way to really make your elitist argument against Obama kind of ironic.

I actually hope this is the message the GOP uses against Obama, considering how likely it is to backfire.

Question Of The Day

In QOTD on June 23, 2008 at 4:14 pm

Bill Kristol, the New York Times’ worst columnist that isn’t Paul Krugman, thinks that if the White House believes that McCain will be elected, Bush will likely leave confrontation with Iran for him to deal with. If the White House thinks Obama will be elected, it will more aggressively deal with the issue.

“If the president thought John McCain were going to be the next president, he would think it more appropriate to let the next president make that decision than do it on his way out. I do wonder with Senator Obama, if President Bush thinks Senator Obama’s going to win, does he somehow think that — does he worry that Obama won’t follow through on that policy.”

Panelist Matt Cavedon:

President Bush’s actions in the next few months will be telling of two things: 1) who he believes will win the election in November and 2) how much he is willing to follow Israel’s cue on Iran. If Bush believes McCain will win, then Kristol is right – he will probably put off taking action. McCain is very much in-line with Bush on Iran, and whatever priorities Bush has now McCain is likely to have following the election.

Obama is a slightly more complicated picture. It is obvious by now that Obama will not follow through with Bush’s plans for Iraq. On Iran, however, most Americans will be surprised by how much Obama will agree with whatever action is taken. In the face of growing criticism over his perceived spinelessness on foreign policy, Obama has become increasingly hawkish towards Iran. At a recent speech at AIPAC, a pro-Israel lobbying group in the US, Obama said:

“There is no greater threat to Israel or peace than Iran… My goal will be to eliminate this threat. I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Everything.”

Although Obama would be hesitant to initiate action against Iran, I would be stunned if he actually comes out against any strikes made on the Islamic Republic prior to the elections. To do so would be political suicide. After the elections are over, he will either have to continue whatever “intense negotiations” or bombings against nuclear facilities that the Bush Administration starts. The only way he would differ from Bush policy would be if the President actually authorizes a land invasion, a highly unlikely circumstance.

Click more to read the rest of Matt’s thoughts and opinions from more of the panel.
Read the rest of this entry »

A Place Called Unity

In Political News on June 23, 2008 at 3:29 pm

Unity, New Hampshire will be the site of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s first joint campaign stop. They both received 107 votes in the January primary there. Expect road-blocked cable coverage of this symbolism heavy event.

Listen To Last Night's Show

In Sunday Show Preview on June 22, 2008 at 9:00 pm

Missed Sunday night’s installment of The Weekly Filibuster? Don’t fret, we’ve got you covered. Click here to listen to our interviews with New York Times bestselling author Thurston Clarke (talking about his new book on Robert Kennedy) and Mike Poss of Perot Charts (on our national debt). The panel, as always, tackles all the week’s political topics.

Author Thurston Clarke & Mike Poss of PerotCharts.com Join Us Tonight

In Sunday Show Preview on June 21, 2008 at 5:32 pm

Join us this tonight at 10pm. We’ll be talking to New York Times bestselling author Thurston Clarke, whose new book “The Last Campaign: Robert F. Kennedy And 82 Days That Inspired America” is gathering plenty of accolades. Tom Brokaw calls it ” a great read, an evocative and engaging reminder of the glory and the tragedy of Bobby Kennedy’s run for the presidency in 1968. Thurston Clarke’s keen eye for the telling detail and his fast-paced narrative make The Last Campaign a must-have for any student of American politics.” We’ll talk to him about Robert Kennedy’s historic campaign and the 2008 election, among other topics. We’ll also be taking your calls at (347) 205-9993. Join us by clicking the “Listen Live” button here at blog.

We’ll also be talking to Mike Poss of Perot Charts about our nation’s debt crisis. So make sure not to miss what’s shaping up to be a great show.

Correction On The Brian Moore Transcript

In Guests on June 21, 2008 at 1:41 pm

Last Sunday, June 15th, we interviewed Socialist Party nominee Brian Moore and posted a transcript of some of his various comments on topics talked about on the show. It was pointed out by a reader that part of our transcript was misleading to what Brian had really meant to suggest:

Notice how they put in brackets to make it look like he was calling all Cuban Americans in Florida terrorists. I don’t believe that was his intention. He was still talking about the right-wing Cuban fascists, and he probably thought the interview guy was asking about them, not all Cuban Floridians.

Turns out that the reader was absolutely correct, and in transcribing we got it wrong, as we all thought he was suggesting something he wasn’t. I just got off the phone with Brian, and he corrected the record. He was talking specifically about the “right-wing fascist” Cuban-Americans who have: “blackmailed their leaders” and “funded assassination attempts on Castro”, as opposed to all Cuban-Americans. He also said that there are “probably some Cubans in Miami that agree with me”. 

Here’s the original transcript. We apologize to anyone upset, and reiterate that we take journalistic integrity very seriously.

 

Big John

In Video on June 21, 2008 at 1:12 pm

Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) just sealed his victory in Texas with a single campaign commercial. This has to be the most brilliant campaign ad in a long time.

Who Won The Week?

In Video on June 21, 2008 at 12:30 pm

Check out my new weekly video feature on WeeklyFilibuster.com:

Question Of The Day

In QOTD on June 20, 2008 at 11:16 am

Recently we’ve seen attacks on both Michelle Obama’s patriotism and Cindy McCain’s wealth. Both the candidates have suggested that the other party should leave their families out of the fray. So, are the spouses of the presidential candidates fair game?

Panelist Tom Dec:

The spouses of the presidential candidates are fair game in that, they, like all other surrogates of the campaign, play a significant role and should be monitored by the press. I don’t know if you can neccessarily say that everything Michelle Obama says should be taken to be the word of Barack Obama, but I think its fair for them to be critiqued. In terms of Bill Clinton in the Democratic Primary, seeing as Bill is a Former President, he is an entity of his own and should be monitored – just like all other Former Presidents should be (and are), and Hillary knew this. If she didn’t want to attract the press, she wouldn’t have used Bill in any significant fashion (which now, in hindsight may have been a good idea).

We should keep in mind, however, that the election is about the candidates – not who who their spouses are, and we should focus primarily on the candidates. The press I think has been relatively good on this front. We heard a lot about Bill, a little about Michelle (especially her comments on being proud of this country for the first time in her adult life), and virtually nothing about Cindy. Lets hope it continues.

Panelist Matt Cavedon:

Choosing a spouse is one of the most crucial signs of a person’s judgment of character. There is no reason why we should not expect our president, with so many important positions to appoint, to select people of good merit in their personal life as well as their public career.

Where we have to be careful is in being superficial about it. If we focus on the looks, cooking style, religious professions, age, or other demographics of a spouse, rather than the content of their character, we are missing out on some really telling information. To suggest that Cindy McCain is far too young or that Michelle Obama is unpatriotic is stupid and distracting. To say that Cindy is unfaithful or that Michelle is unfeeling, however, is fair game for the campaigns if there is evidence behind it.

To expect a wall of separation between a person’s personal and public lives is to suggest that the person has two distinct personalities. If so, there are greater reasons to avoid them than poor choice in spouses.

Join Us Sunday At 10pm

In Sunday Show Preview on June 19, 2008 at 6:56 pm

Make sure to join us this Sunday at 10pm on The Weekly Filibuster. Tom Dec will be filling in as moderator, and we’ll have guest panelist Tobin Weltin return. Also joining us for the first time will be our new Republican panelist, Sage Koontz. We’ll keep you up to date on our special guest(s) as we get confirmations. You can listen to the show by going to www.weeklyfilibuster.com every Sunday at 10pm. As always, we’re taking your calls about the top political issues of the week.

Topics: Obama Opting-Out Of Public Financing, Both Candidates Flip-Flopping On The GI Bill, Michelle Obama’s Makeover, and more.

NOTE: To listen to our interview with Prohibition Party Candidate Gene Amondson, CLICK HERE. He begins about 10 minutes in.

Public Financing

In Political News on June 19, 2008 at 4:14 pm

Halperin, who is always able to boil things down, explains why Obama opted out of public financing – and why nobody is really going to care:

3. If Obama had stayed in the public system, he would have been giving up the
type of huge advantage the ambitious people rarely give up.

5. Obama will now be able to, say, spend $15 million on Texas television ads, giving McCain some tough choices to make.

6. No candidate has ever had as big a spending advantage as Obama will have for the final two months of the campaign.

7. Because of the nature of the media’s coverage of Obama, he is unlikely to pay too heavy a price for going back on his pledge.

Yep. Obama would be insane to accept public financing, and the McCain campaign would agree.

We’ll be talking about Obama’s decision to opt-out of public financing on our show this Sunday at 10pm. We’ll post a link to listen live here on the blog.

Obama's First General Election Ad

In Video on June 19, 2008 at 4:00 pm

The ad will air in Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia.

Question Of The Day

In QOTD on June 19, 2008 at 2:10 pm

The panelists respond to Slate.com’s Jack Shafer:

I wonder whether the media grievers gave a moment of thought to how this Russert torrent they produced played with viewers and readers. Did the grievers really think Russert was so important, so vital to the nation’s course, and such an elevated human being that he deserved hour upon hour of tribute? I wonder whether any of the responsible journalists paused to think, Hey, this is really weird. We’re using our unchecked editorial power to soak the nation with our tears about our friend, and that’s unseemly!

On days like this, I, too, hate the press.

Panelist Matt Cavedon:

As we discussed recently on the show, the media tends to enjoy a person’s narrative more than their merit. It is impossible that any man could possibly live up to Tim Russert’s accolades as the media proclaims them. No one man is the King of Washington and the Voice of Authority in politics in the way he was. This is exaggeration.

It is not, however, the truly unjust thing about how the media covers the dearly departed. All too often, a person with a reasonable amount of merit is heralded as a hero and a prophet. Listening to the encomiums showered on Russert, you would think that his humility in the face of fame was stoic, that his affability was somehow shocking. Certainly, Russert seemed like an average Joe in a big place, the kind of guy you could meet at a cookout in your neighbor’s backyard and shoot the breeze with without him getting condescending on you. But that’s exactly the point. Rather than glorifying Russert for staying “true to his roots”, shouldn’t we expect a little more decency and humility from everyone else on the air?

Whenever we praise an off-duty firefighter for rescuing a would-be suicide jumper, a nurse for stopping traffic around a fallen kid, or a reporter for not being an asshole in the tenth degree, we are doing injustice to the goodness of human nature. I truly believe that most people would act in these ways if put in the situation. Rather than Russert being special, everyone else on the air has become tacky and jaded.

Let’s clap Russert on the back for being an average guy who valued family, faith, and his home, not a hero. And let’s glare at the people who have made his type a true rarity in the public sphere.

Panelist Robert Burack:

Russert’s colleagues at NBC, arguably most in politics and journalism as well, idolized the man. When someone who is idolized passes, they’re talked up and the details of their life that don’t shine as bright are pushed aside: momentarily forgotten. This country has had its share of idols. When Elvis died, we forgot his drug habit and remembered the music. When John F. Kennedy died, we forgot some of the shakier decisions of his presidency, and remembered the man who inspired us.

To most of America, Russert wasn’t an idol. But to those who covered and had a love of politics, he was the pinnacle. Russert’s coverage should probably have been cut back in light of the floods in Iowa and other news, but I have to admit I enjoyed every minute of the stories shared.

Is Muslim A Smear?

In Commentary on June 19, 2008 at 12:56 pm

A commenter, reformislam, takes an interesting view I haven’t seen before:

Why is the presidential candidate who claims to be religiously inclusive is treating the word “Muslim” as an insult? Apparently, it is OK for Mr. Obama to be associated with terrorists like William Ayers or racists like Jeremiah Wright, but God forbid somebody would call him a Muslim! No, he won’t stand for that kind of smear! We admit that most terrorists are Muslims, but most Muslims are not terrorists and the statement on Mr. Obama’s website is insulting to hundreds of millions of people.

What he’s missing is that the Obama campaign is only calling this a smear because that’s how it has been directed. People have called him a Muslim for the purposes of harming him politically. It’s being purposely circulated, accompanied by other slander. That’s constitutes a smear. Accusations of being a terrorist. A smear. A considerable amount of Americans, sadly, would not vote for Obama if he was a Muslim. You’re right though, on the human element. The Obama campaign has to be careful not to risk alienating  those in the Arab American community in their attempts to set the record straight. A fine line to walk, indeed.

Caution Versus Inclusiveness

In Political News on June 19, 2008 at 2:44 am

The New York Times looks at the Obama campaign’s attempt to control their candidate’s environment.

At a rally for Senator Barack Obama in Detroit on Monday, two Muslim women said they were prohibited from sitting behind the candidate because they were wearing head scarves and campaign volunteers did not want them to appear with him in news photographs or live television coverage

We’ve seen how much viciously the media has helped contribute to the rumors going around about Obama, so can we really blame the volunteers? A terrorist fist jab. Shameful.

The volunteer’s hearts were in the right place, wanting to protect him. Their minds, however, must have lapsed. The only way to fight the smears is by confronting them head on – not distancing yourself from Arab Americans. This doesn’t pair up. It seems to skirt around it. The people, my grandmother included, that believe Obama is a terrorist aren’t going to have their ignorant minds changed. Nor were they going to vote for the Democratic candidate in the first place.

Watch As The National Press Club Loses Its Credibility

In Political News on June 19, 2008 at 2:30 am

David Weigel of Reason Magazine, who you’ll remember if you caught CSPAN’s coverage of the Libertarian convention, recounts Larry Sinclair’s bizzare press conference yesterday at the National Press Club. I’m not sure whether to be disgusted or amused.

How did Sinclair hold up? Rather terribly. He started with a lengthy statement that admitted most (not all) of his crimes and dispatched Sibley to run around the room with a microphone. As Seth Colter Walls recounts, most of the questions were legalistic and (somewhat) credulous. Sinclair was asked who funded the event (donors, over the internet), how he made his living (he’s on disability), and whether Obama was “well hung” (I’m not going to dignify his answer here). The only new “evidence” he presented was the name of a limo driver and the bar where he claimed to have met Obama (who, in Sinclair’s story, used his real name and job title as he rendevouzed with a cruising criminal he’d never met before).

I only got to ask one question: What time of day did Sinclair meet with Obama on November 6th and November 7th? In Sinclair’s story, Obama partied with him on the 6th and traveled to his hotel in Gurnee, IL (an hour and change from Hyde Park) on the 7th. Sinclair smiled at the question. “We met in the early evening of November 6th,” he said. “As far as a specific time on November 7th, I can not provide that to you.” He added, parenthetically: “And I know where this question is coming from.”

“You know where this question is coming from?”

Things We'll Be Watching Wednesday

In Oddball on June 17, 2008 at 11:45 pm

  • Morning Joe. Just because.
  • Michelle Obama try to revamp her image as a co-host on “The View”. ABC at 11am eastern.
  • Tim Russert’s memorial services at the Kennedy Center. MSNBC at 4pm eastern.
  • News coverage of the Celtics’ NBA championship.
  • Martha Wainwright performing on Letterman and author Junot Diaz on Colbert.

 

Sad To See Howard Wolfson Out Of Work

In Political News on June 17, 2008 at 11:26 pm

If you’re ever curious about the conference calls reporters sit though, Huffington Post has them all for you to enjoy. I feel bad for whoever has to sit through these.

Question of The Day

In QOTD on June 17, 2008 at 2:41 pm

What can third party candidates do to gain more exposure?

Panelist Matt Cavedon:

Third parties need to recruit more well-known candidates, especially ones with independent wealth who can afford to properly advertise. Ross Perot was highly successful because he was a successful entrepreneur with vast reserves of wealth. Bob Barr has pretty good name recognition and credibility from his days in the Gingrich Revolution. Ralph Nader is a respected consumer advocate.

Third party candidates need to find an area of overlap between the two major party candidates and exploit it. Perot was a phenomenally successful third party candidate because both the GOP and the Democrats were seen as favoring higher taxes and bigger government. Perot came along gunning hard for traditional right-wing economics, balanced budgets, and limited government intervention in the economy and social policy. He scored big because of his ability to find a niche most Americans believed in already. In 1996, the Contract with America was the GOP platform. It incorporated his main ideas, and the GOP swept Congress.

If I were a third-party candidate now, I would seek to exploit conservative social views. Somebody like Mike Huckabee could do very well in this climate, given that he is socially conservative and economically liberal. Although he will not buck the party establishment, you will see more of his type moving towards leadership in a more populist GOP.

Ron Paul’s folks also hit the nail on the head as far as appealing to what people already believe in. The GOP nominally stands for limited government, laissez-faire economics, delegation of social policy to state authorities, and non-interventionism abroad. By pointing out the vast discrepancies between what the GOP ideally supports and what the Bush Administration has practiced, he became a cult idol.

The trick is not in adopting totally extremist positions about revolution, allowing sixteen year-olds to vote, legalizing acid, disbanding the army, releasing all prisoners, banning alcohol, deporting all illegal immigrants, and giving every citizen grenades from the government. That is the kind of idiotic crap that makes people immediately dismissive towards the modern third parties.

Panelist Robert Burack:

Third party candidates are notorious for their criticism of modern mainstream media. Much of their criticism is justified: major media outlets have largely ignored candidates who aren’t running in the two major political parties. However, third party candidates are often too eccentric to be truly viable in a country as shallow as ours can be.

Third party candidates need to learn to be media-savvy. Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, Ron Paul, Mike Gravel, and Ross Perot have been successful because they’ve understood how the media works, and how they can use that to their advantage. They were perceived as quirky, not insane. They had considerable speaking skills: which is everything in television.

Luckily for third party candidates, more and more Americans receive their political news from online sources. This is a real opportunity for lesser know candidates to get their message out. Was Mike Gravel’s “rock” video odd and hilarious? Absolutely. But did it encourage more people to head to his website and check out what his candidacy was about? You bet.

Add your thoughts in the comments section.

Guest Gene Amondson This Monday

In Guests on June 13, 2008 at 12:28 am

Make sure to catch a special edition of the show Monday, as we talk to special guest Gene Amondson. Gene is the Prohibition Party’s 2008 Presidential Candidate. The Prohibition Party advocates for the, yes you’ve guessed it, prohibition of alcohol. Amondson has been featured on The Daily Show and Oprah. Do you think alcohol should be legal? Make sure to call in and give Gene your two cents this Monday at 10pm on The Weekly Filibuster.

Bob Barr: Libertarian Presidential Nominee

In Political News on May 25, 2008 at 6:48 pm

Today, after six rounds of voting, former congressman (R-GA) Bob Barr won the Libertarian presidential nomination after defeating 1983 Libertarian presidential nominee Mary Ruwart 54 – 46%.

Barr was certainly the most well known candidate, having lead the house effort to impeach President Clinton and written such pieces of legislation as the Defense of Marriage Act. Barr’s conservative past was a point of suspicion for such party activists as Christine Smith who, in a rousing speech on the convention floor, suggested that a “neocon” shouldn’t be chosen as the nominee and that doing so would mean the party had lost its principles. Barr’s major opponent Ruwart used his stances on such issues as the war on drugs in an attempt to position him as someone who doesn’t hold true Libertarian values. However, in the end, Barr’s national status and alignment with Wayne Allyn Root sealed his victory.

Today also marked Mike Gravel’s last in American politics, as he announced he was going to focus entirely on his books and lectures.

We’ll have more coverage of the 2008 Libertarian Convention on tonight’s show at 10pm EST.

2008 Libertarian Party Debate

In Commentary on May 24, 2008 at 11:39 pm

REMINDER: Click here to hear our exclusive interview with Libertarian Party candidate Mike Gravel.

Tired of the boring, Wolf Blitzer moderated, debates featuring the candidates of the two major parties where the same safe questions are asked and the same parsed answers are given? Me too. In fact, I’ve actually dozed off during a few. So I was delighted to find that the 2008 Libertarian Party Debate from Denver was: interesting, lively, funny, engaging, and refreshing. Debating were seven candidates for the nomination: former Georgia congressman Bob Barr, former senator and Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel, Massachusetts Libertarian Party Chairman George Phillies, Michael Jingozian, Dr. Mary Ruwart, Steve Kubby, and small businessman Wayne Allyn Root. There are actually fourteen candidates, but only seven of them reached the viability threshold of having raised at least $5,000. Moderating was Fox News political analyst and all around funny-man James Pinkerton, who gets booed as his entire resume is announced. So get ready to hear the words “liberty” and “freedom” a lot. In the spirit of tonight’s debate, some of this coverage is tongue-in-cheek.

Rules & Debate Format

Each candidate gets the chance for a two minute opening statement. At this debate, there aren’t any fancy lights or timers for the candidates, just signs and a cow bell. Pinkerton reveals some of the submitted questions he won’t be asking tonight, including: if as president the candidate would fly commercial and whether they’d pardon Michael Vick. That’s a sign of things to come, making this funniest presidential debate I’ve ever seen.

Opening Statements

Barr gives a general answer about Libertarian principles. Gravel says that the United States is at an important juncture and that we shouldn’t expect the people who brought us to where we are to fix things. The two major parties have a monopoly on politics and the government and are raising lots of money to provide more of the same. Talks about the military industrial complex. Phillies was one of my favorite characters. This guy kept shouting. Talked about getting Uncle Sam out of our bedrooms. Important issues are ending the war and restoring fiscal sanity and civil liberties. Says he’s the centrist the party needs as the nominee. Jingozian talks about his Libertarian principles. Ruwart’s main talking point throughout the night is that the party should elect her to take advantage of the “year of the woman”. Says her twenty-five years of Libertarian campaign experience are important. Important issues are decreasing crime and health insurance costs. Kubby says he has some good news and bad news. The bad being that the doctors have told him that he only has six months to live. The good news being that this is the thirty-fourth year they’ve been telling him that. He wants us to know that his candidacy isn’t only about medical marijuana, no more than boston tea party was about tea. True liberty is freedom from government. Root will, throughout the evening, continually bring up the fact that he’s a used car salesman small business man. He calls himself an SOB: son of a butcher. He reminds us that if nominated, it would be the first time that a: small business man, home-schooling dad, jewish man, resident of Nevada, and classmate of Barack Obama would have gotten such a nomination. What’s the difference between Vegas and Washington? In Vegas the drunks gamble away their own money … in Washington they gamble away ours. Oh, Wayne. He promises to stay the hell out of your wallet. Has a secret sixteen year plan to win races for libertarian candidates.

Philosopher Who Has Influenced You The Most

Barr mentions Ayn Rand. Gravel is with Solon, who brought forth the concept of law in 595 BC. Phillies goes for Goldwater, who would apparently call his book “The Conscience of a Libertarian” if he were alive today. Jingozian goes with Benjamin Franklin. Ruwart’s first love was Ayn Rand. Kubby goes with David Nolan, who founded the party. Root goes with Yogi Bear and mentions forks in the road and picnic baskets.

Would you send troops to any part of the world?

Everyone is, obviously, opposed to this. Phillies says something off the wall about pirates. Almost everyone is also in favor of cutting the military’s budget.

Would you restrict the building of nuclear power plants?

Everyone agrees that the power of the president is too limited to do this and all revert to their plans on renewable energy. Kubby’s car runs off cooking oil! Root says that ethanol has been a disaster, increasing the cost of food. Barr says he likes polar bears. Gravel makes a pledge to get us off of gasoline in five years.

View On Global Environment

Everyone expresses similar disdain that our government, the world’s number one polluter, is in charge of our environment. Kubby says that this is similar to the fox guarding the chicken coop, and that we should arm the chickens. Root says that Al Gore is the worlds number two polluter. Barr is not in favor of the Kyoto treaty. Phillies wants people who throw lit matches on houses in prison.

Patriot Act & Real ID Act

Everyone would abolish both of the acts. In the nights only comment close to a smack-down, Kubby mentions Barr’s vote for the Patriot Act. Root says that the Patriot Act is the single biggest thing that turned him into a Libertarian. Fighting a war supposedly for freedom at the same time we’re having ours taken away doesn’t make sense. There’s no way, Jose, that Wayne Allyn Root isn’t going to stand for that. Barr mentions that full body scanners at airports are just another manifestation of that fact that fear is the driving force behind all public policy with this administration. He’d shoot, burn, decapitate the Patriot Act … and then scatter its ashes across the ends of the earth, so that it couldn’t be put back together again. (Dahm.) Jingozian deadpans that you can’t not like it because its got the word “patriot” in it.

Border Policy

Kubby says that our current immigration policy seems like it’d be the KKK’s. Root knows the situation personally, since his grandparents came from Russia AT THE TURN OF THE CENTURY. Barr doesn’t think we even have an immigration policy. Gravel speaks about how European countries are actually decreasing their border protection. Phillies muses about the day in which wealth is distributed enough to where we won’t have a need for borders. Jingozian says that we need to end the welfare state in order to help the economy.

Should the war on drugs be illegal?

Root says it should be. The fact that forty percent of all Americans over eighteen admit to using drugs is a testament to its failure. Gravel mentions a report Nixon commissioned that found marijuana wasn’t addictive and that drugs should be treated as a public health problem. He doesn’t think we should be proud of having more people in jail than any other country. The war on drugs costs taxpayers several hundred billion dollars a year. Phillies recalls watching gangster movies in the fifties. Jingozian would pardon all non-violent drug offenders. Ruwart points to the Netherlands, whose drug use dropped when they legalized them. Kubby is getting a major buzz!

Criteria For Supreme Court Appointments

Seems like everyone wants to nominate Judge Jim Grey. Gravel mentions setting term limits of Supreme Court Justices (which is a very good idea). Phillies wouldn’t appoint a defense attorney. Ruwart says that our neighbors will try to control us one day. Root tells us that THE civil rights issues of the twenty-first century is parents being able to educate kids in any way they see fit. THE CIVILS RIGHTS ISSUE OF THIS CENTURY. The government won’t tell him how to educate his kids … at least not over his cold dead fingers.

How much involvement should the government have in healthcare?

Candidates mention: eliminating cost transfers, approving European drugs, tort reform, treating Veterans better, and deregulating. We learn that Barr travels forty-five miles to see his doctor, whose doctor bill would be fifty percent less if it weren’t for government regulation. Jingozian has only learned two things in the past year of campaigning, and one of them is that Americans aren’t stupid. Phillies keeps reminding me of James Lipton.

Defense Of Marriage Act & LGBT Marital Rights

Almost all candidates mention repealing DOMA and most mention that marriage should be for all. Phillies is proud to be from Massachusetts. Ruwart says that people don’t realize the kind of legal contract they’re signing when they get married … until they get divorced. Kubby doesn’t want the government looking up our skirts and trousers (and neither do I)! Ray Romano Root doesn’t understand why gays would want to get married in the first place. Barr stands up because his “rear end is killing him” and because he wants us to know that he wrote the DOMA and promises to repeal the law provisions in it. He doesn’t mention LGBT rights. Gravel says that marriage is a secular term and that it’s really just a commitment of love between two human beings. If this world needs something, its more love (right on, Gravel). 

How will your campaign help the Libertarian Party?

Jingozian is happy he’s being asked that. The party needs to enroll all of the American people and appeal to independents. It’s a disgrace that they’ve only gotten about 1.1 percent of the vote, he says. Ruwart wants to get more votes for party. She brings up the women’s vote again. Wants to help local and state candidates. THE Ron Paul endorsed her book, everybody. She’d encourage “Ron Paul activists” to vote for Libertarian candidates. and would invite them into the party, but apparently only she can do that because you have to be respected in their community. Kubby reminds us all of when Libertarians used to be confused with libraries. (Aren’t we still in that time?) Expects to see a book by Hillary Clinton called “I’ve Always Been A Libertarian” out soon. Nickname alert: Insane McCain! Root emphasizes fundraising and voter constituencies. He’s a small business man for Christ’s sake! Small business men from around the country can raise the money to run a dynamite campaign, he says. He can bring in twelve million online poker enthusiasts. Barr makes the best case: he’ll be the only one who’d get any attention. Gravel reminds us of what a true political badass he is. He: stopped the draft, stopped nuclear testing in the North Pacific, got the authorization for the Alaska pipeline, and risked jail by releasing pentagon papers all in four years. Says “freedom” three times in a row, so you know he means it. Phillies won’t make fabulous promises. Gives the same speech a bad high school student council candidate would. 

Second Amendment

All in favor. Moderator interrupts a candidate with: “rat-a-tat-tat, times up”.

Everyone gives a closing statement about their Libertarian principles. David Weigel of Reason Magazine says that the two with a real shot are Bob Barr and Mary Ruwart. In an appropriate closing, a caped man wearing a “V for Vendetta” mask jumps off of the stage.

 

An X-ray of a very dark soul?

In Commentary on May 24, 2008 at 12:13 pm

Yesterday I wrote that I felt Clinton’s “assassination” remarks were being misrepresented, taken out of context. At first glance it seemed that way. Hillary has always been desperate to make the case for her continuing to remain in the race, and despite how badly she wants to be the nominee by convincing voters she’s more electable, I didn’t for a second believe she’d want to see Obama assassinated in order for that to happen. I still don’t think that and hope my intuition is correct. However, I’ve yet to make sense of just why the hell she would say what she did. In a country where: politicians and leaders similar to Obama in offering a message of hope and change have been killed for that message, in a campaign where: Obama received racially charged death threats the moment he announced in Springfield and has had offices vandalized with ethnic slurs spray-painted on windows, in a time when: african-americans were reluctant to support Obama because of this very real fear, in my mind where: I was stopped by a man at the NAACP convention in Detroit last year and warned that such a thing would happen to Obama, something I dismissed but was still at the back of my mind and in the minds of many there … for Hillary Clinton to say something of that manner is not only in-artful, as its been described, but disturbingly wrong. I watched the video of her “apologizing” in a South Dakota supermarket. It was the first time in a long time that I’ve felt sorry for her. She, for the first time, looked as if she realized that the words she has used in this campaign have truly disturbed and hurt people. Her words were addressed to the Kennedy family, when they should’ve been addressed to everyone else: anyone who remembers where they were June 5th of 1968, November 22nd of 1963, April 4th of 1968. Many of us have tolerated the continuation of her lifeless campaign, even after the reality that she has no chance of winning set in, but this is just too much. 

Keith Olbermann in a powerful special comment:

Some other interesting commentary on her remarks, including the Daily News column from which this post’s headline was taken.

The always accessible Donna Brazile

From: “Donna Brazile” <xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 6:35 AM
To: <xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.com>
Subject: Re: Hillary remarks

I completly understand. Here I am on vacation and can barely sleep.

This is the most disturbing gaffe ever and it has to stop soon. None of us — and that includes me deserve to compete based on what ifs which might include the death of one’s opponents.

I pray for Obama, yes I pray for Hillary, but I also pray for us all.
Thanks for writing. I am truly sorry for this moment.

Donna

Update: Two poignant Daily Kos diaries. 

Daily Dozen: Assassination Vacation

In Political News on May 23, 2008 at 6:49 pm

The twelve most interesting and essential stories of the day.

Clinton brings up Bobby Kennedy’s assassination, and some ugly memories, in what I think is a quote widely being misrepresented. Just as long as this doesn’t mean Lanny Davis will be back on TV.

CNN reports that the Clinton and Obama camps have begun discussions about the possibility of Hillary as Vice President. Howard Wolfson denies this, and hopefully he’s not lying.

The 2000 Florida election is getting the HBO treatment. So, if you’re home this weekend, be sure to check out “Recount”. I can’t wait to see Laura Dern as Katherine “Unless There’s A Hurricane” Harris.

Mike Allen has a list of names that seem to keep coming up in Veepstakes ‘08. Dodd? Warner? Bloomberg?

Ambinder’s predictions. Sebelius, keeping in mind a potential backlash by women, seems to keep coming up.

I’d give the most weight to Lynn Sweet’s list, who seems to be the most knowledgeable about the campaign this cycle. The New York Observer had a great piece on Lynn recently, so be sure to check that out.

Ron Rosenbaum writes what I think is the days most interesting article: about why it isn’t necessarily bad to favor Obama because he’s black.

Seven add-on delegates to be decided this weekend. They’re all from states Obama won, so it’s likely that he’ll amass either six or all seven of them.

Joe Biden punches back at Lieberman and the GOP’s foreign policy strategy in this Wall Street Journal Op-Ed published today. He made the morning show rounds earlier today to talk about the article.

Two more Edwards delegates switch to Obama, giving him a total of five for the day. He’s now only 56 delegates away from winning the nomination.

The war over whether or not Michelle Obama will be an asset or liability in the fall. Besides the “proud of my country” gaffe, Michelle has been a very effective surrogate. She’s actually a better speaker than her husband.

Daily Dozen: Desperation

In Political News on May 22, 2008 at 5:21 pm

The twelve most interesting and essential stories of the day.

New York Governor Patterson calls Clinton’s attempt to change the rules regarding Michigan and Florida as “desperation”. It is desperation, they’re grasping at straws to come up with a coherent argument.

Obama begins his VP selection process. It’s going to be headed by James Johnson, who did the same thing for Kerry in 2004 and Mondale in 1984.

A how to guide for registering high school seniors. We can expect youth turnout to dramatically increase this fall, with a presidential candidate that seems to be drawing their interest and engaging them.

CNN’s headquarters in Atlanta will be the site of a rally for Obama supporters on the night of June 3rd.

Time’s Tumulty speculates on what Clinton really wants. I wish I could figure it out. She certainly wants to be the nominee, but as that increasingly looks less likely … is VP her goal? An Obama/Clinton ticket would be disastrous.

Obama will be swinging through three important “purple” states next week: New Mexico, Colorado, and Nevada. Again, Obama is going to continue the shift into general election mode.

The McCain campaign will release John’s extended medical records this weekend, Memorial Day weekend. That means anything of interest will get far less coverage than usual.

Ellen DeGeneres asks John McCain to walk her down the aisle. He seems to completely side-step her gay marriage question, which was quite emotional. One of the great things about this new generation seems to be it’s increasing tolerance and acceptance of others.

Could Hillary force her way onto the ticket? It certainly seems so. She has no chance of winning the nomination, and yet it seems like everyone in the Democratic party is still afraid of her.

Jonathan Alter on why Clinton’s claim of having won the popular vote aren’t necessarily true. Her argument doesn’t include caucus states or Michigan, where Obama wasn’t even on the ballot.

Harold Ickes wants Michigan’s “uncommitted” delegates to stay uncommitted, in what has to be the dumbest argument ever. I’m here in Michigan, and “uncommitted” was the Obama alternative. Most Edwards supporters have gone to Obama, what little percent he would have attracted.

Watch, or listen to, “Meet the Press” host Tim Russert fart on television on Tuesday’s “Race to the White House”. I’m willing to let the Daily Dozen lose a little bit of its class in order to link this.

Daily Dozen: Et tu, Patti?

In Political News on May 19, 2008 at 7:36 pm

The twelve most interesting and essential stories of the day.

Dahm. 75,000 is an impressive crowd, the campaign’s largest to date. These are the kinds of crowds we’d expect in a general election. Another sign the Democratic party is beginning to coalesce around Obama?

Patti Solis Doyle considerings joining team “O”. Et tu, Patti? Other than the Brutus-esque headlines this would produce, I’m not sure the Obama campaign wants someone as clearly incompetent as Doyle on board.

Pablano, a blogger whose Indiana and North Carolina predictions were almost spot on, says Obama will take Oregon by 13 points once all the votes are in. Who does this help in the expectations game?

Major Democratic donor Haim Saban reportedly attempted to bribe the YDA’s two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse Clinton, at $500,000 a piece. Is a superdelegate vote worth that much? Is this even legal?

Clinton claims to have the edge in popular vote … if you count Michigan (where Obama wasn’t on the ballot) and Florida (where no campaigning took place, making the primary essentially a beauty pageant).

Kristol’s NYT column continues to get things wrong. If the OP-ED board was looking for a conservative point of view, they could’ve done much better.

West Virginia senator Robert Byrd endorses Obama, counting as one of Obama’s five superdelegate pick ups for the day. According to the campaign, they’re only 109 delegates away from claiming the nomination.

Despite the fact that Obama will have a majority of pledged delegates by the end of Tuesday night, he won’t claim the nomination due to a fear of enraging Clinton supporters.

Wolfson says that if Obama does claim the nomination, it will be a “slap in the face”. Wording Wolfson choose on purpose, considering how upset woman supporters have been about the perceived level of sexism during the campaign?

McCain = Jesus? Either way, I’m sure we’ll be hearing a lot more about McCain’s time as a POW.

Halperin previews tomorrow.

Geraldine Ferraro may not vote for Obama in November.

Our General Election Maps

In Commentary on May 18, 2008 at 10:30 pm

On tonight’s show, we discussed what the electoral map might look like for the fall. Using Predict November, we each created our own general election map. Take a look at each of ours below, and share your own by commenting. Also make sure to include your thoughts on each of our electoral maps.

Tom Dec: New Mexico for Obama, Missouri for Obama, Wisconsin for McCain, Virginia for Obama, West Virginia for McCain, Florida for McCain, Ohio for McCain, Iowa for Obama. Obama wins 274-264.

Matt Cavedon: New Mexico for Obama, Missouri for McCain, Wisconsin for Obama, Virginia for McCain, West Virginia for Obama, Florida for McCain, Ohio for McCain, Iowa for Obama. McCain wins 273-265.

Robert Burack: New Mexico for Obama, Colorado for Obama, Missouri for Obama, Wisconsin for Obama, Virginia for McCain, West Virginia for McCain, Florida for McCain, Ohio for McCain, Iowa for Obama. Obama wins 280-258.

Ben Goodman: Colorado for Obama, New Mexico, Nevada for Obama, Missouri for Obama, Wisconsin for Obama, Virginia for Obama, West Virginia for McCain, Florida for McCain, Ohio for McCain, Iowa for Obama. Obama wins 298-240.

Sunday Morning Political Breakfast

In Sunday Morning on April 13, 2008 at 1:52 pm

Each week, “The Daily Filibuster” hopes to sum up the conventional wisdom from the beltway titans of Sunday morning political talk in the “Sunday Morning Political Breakfast”.

Meet The Press (NBC): First up is the gold standard in Sunday talk. Today there’s a pundit panel with Republican strategists Mike Murphy and Mary Matalin, and Democratic strategists Bob Shrum and James Carville. Russert reminds us that there are only nine days left until the Pennsylvania primary.

State of the Race: Obama has 1,416 pledged delegates and 230 superdelegates, for a total of 1,646 delegates. Clinton has 1,252 pledged delegates and 259 superdelegates, for a total of 1,511 delegates. Obama has won 28 states and 13.4 million votes to Clinton’s 14 states and 12.7 million votes. The latest Time Magazine poll of Pennsylvania shows Clinton leading 44% to 38%, a six point spread. In Indiana, a recent poll shows Clinton leading 49% to 46%, while Obama leads 35% to 26% in North Carolina, where 39% of voters are undecided.

The first topic is the one that will largely dominate the conversation this morning, Obama’s “bitter” quote during a San Francisco fundraiser.

“Speaking Sunday at a closed-door fundraiser, Obama said he understands why some working-class voters become frustrated and vote on single issues.

“It’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations,” he said, according to the Huffington Post Web site.”

Clinton responded, saying she was “taken aback” by the comments she viewed as “elitist” and “demeaning to small town America”. Obama fired back at a town hall, saying that he’s really the one in touch with small town America, mentioning McCain’s fumbling on the “home foreclosure issue” and Clinton’s vote for “a credit card sponsored bankruptcy bill” that “makes it harder for people to get out of debt”. He admitted that he could’ve phrased what he meant in his “bitter” comments better.

The Ragin’ Cajun argues that Obama doesn’t understand the relationship between the people of Pennsylvania and their guns.

Shrum admits that there’s an element of truth in what Obama said, and that Obama’s opponents want to tag him as elitist. He also suggets that Clinton wants to use this to draw attention attention away from Bill’s recent comments on the Bosnia sniper story.

Matalin observes that Obama isn’t the type of Democrat America wants, and that these comments would be a general election nightmare.

Murphy adds that Obama’s comments were “beyond beautiful” from a Republican point of view, but that Barack still prevails. Answers his own question of “how the hell do working class whites still vote republican” by bringing up the Democrat’s failure to connect culturally.

Shrum inserts that this is certain to be a subject brought up at the debate Wednesday. Make sure to check back to our blog this Wednesday for live coverage of the ABC Democratic debate.

Matalin insists “He’s not the candidate he promised to be … he promised to be this great new communicator of the Democratic party”. Shrum, rightly, finds that rich considering McCain’s multiple Sunni/Shiite misflaps.

The topic switches to Bill Clinton’s Bosnia comments. Four videos of Senator Clinton repeating the sniper claims, from different days and hours, are played. Carville laughs and recalls a lesson president Clinton once taught him, “every time we make it about us, we lose; every time we make it about them (the voters), we win”. Smiled and admitted that Senator Clinton’s advice to her husband to “shut up” was good advice. Murphy suggests the real problem is that president Clinton has become a “self-parody”.

Topic switches to Penn firing, which happened after the Sunday shows last week. Shrum says that Penn’s “original sin” wasn’t the Columbian meeting, but “coming up with a strategy that left [Clinton] as the establishment candidate in a year of change”.

Carville attempts to make Indiana the “tie-breaker”, quoting Obama. He’s asked if he’s “clinging to Indiana like a life preserver”.

Carville says he’s “happy” that he made the Judas comment in regards to Bill Richardson, and suggests that Richardson isn’t telling the truth.

Veepstakes: McCain: a credible governor, Pawlenty, Ridge, or Romney. Obama: anti-war general, Wes Clark, Bloomberg, General James Jones, or Hagel.

Carville and Shrum laugh when Matalin suggests that people are “sick of bush bashing” and Dick Cheney is “a brilliant man”.

This Week With George Stephanopoulos (ABC): From Katmandu, where he’s monitoring the election, is former President Jimmy Carter, who suggests that we shouldn’t boycott the Olympics in Beijing. On his scheduled meeting with the leader of Hamas, which has drawn negative attention from the White House: says that he’ll be meeting with a whole gamut of people who have a role to play in an Israeli peace treaty and that a recent poll of the Israeli people shows that they want direct negotiations to occur.

Some of the negative attention has come from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who has said that Carter should be disinvited to the Democratic Convention. The presidential candidates and major Democratic politicians have suggested they wouldn’t have such a meeting, citing that Hamas is a known terrorist group. Carter that he wasn’t surprised that those “in the midst of campaigns” would distance themselves.

Carter played coy on whether he supported Obama, and told Stephanopoulos he’d make his endorsement at the convention. He agrees with Pelosi’s litmus test for the nomination, but also says that superdelegates are free to support whomever they want. Guinea Worm Disease is likely to be eradicated by next year, Carter reports.

Next up is National Security Advisor Hadley, who fails to answer that question of whether or not Bush will be present at the Olympic opening ceremonies. Reports that the Iraqi government will soon be financing 75% of their security force costs.

The Roundtable: ABC News Correspondent George Will, Democratic Strategist Donna Brazile, ABC News Correspondent Torie Clarke, and Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin.

Will thinks Obama’s “bitter” comments are a big deal. He refers to past comments about arugula, and Michelle Obama talking about dance class bills. Halperin says that Clinton will have an easier time making the “elitist” argument because it’s one she really believes. Clarke says that Obama can easily recover and that Clinton has to be careful to not “overplay her hand”. Brazile says that Obama speaks in a manner that attempts to educate people, a product of his days as a constitutional law professor.

Should Obama give a “Race Speech II” about patriotism and values? Consensus is no. Clarke argues that Pennsylvania voters respond better to more practical approaches. Halperin predicts that Senator Casey will come out today and help cover for Obama (see “Late Edition” coverage below) and hints that there is video out there that would keep the story around much longer.

On Bill Clinton’s Bosnia comments, Halperin jokes that it “takes someone pretty eloquent to cram that many mistakes into one soundbite”, says that Obama’s gaffe really helped the Clinton campaign divert attention away from the story.

Stephanopoulos mentions this story about president Clinton’s connections to a firm that has worked with China to crackdown on Tibet.

My favorite “Sunday Funny”, Colbert’s joint Obama-McCain commercial, suggesting they’d pick up the phone at 3PM and Clinton wouldn’t, because she’d be too busy sleeping from being up all night.

The Chris Matthews Show (NBC): This week’s panel consists of NBC News corespondent Kelly O’Donnell, Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page, New York Times reporter Elisabeth Bumiller, and New York Times columnist David Brooks. Because this show is taped a few days in advance, there’s an absence of any talk on Obama’s comments.

Can McCain be the candidate of change? 64% of Americans don’t think he is, likening his policies to Bush’s.

Let’s go to the Matthews Meter: McCain Vs. Obama, who does better with independents? Obama 10-2. McCain Vs. Clinton, who does better with independents? McCain 11-1.

The panelists find Bill’s comment as destructive as I do, pointing out that this doesn’t bode well for her “3AM” argument. A rather humorous video of president Clinton continuing to speak after Bush has taken office is played. Brooks jokes that nobody over sixty forgets being shot at.

Will white women vote for Obama in the fall? The Gallup Poll has him rising 8 points with white Democratic women in the past three weeks. The Matthews Meter says 10-2 that “white female Dems” will “vote for Obama like they did for Kerry and Gore”. Bumiller says that women are upset that Obama has taken their narrative of making history and that if Clinton were to lose the nomination, she would help Obama with women in the fall because she wants “a future in the party”. Brooks suggests that it’s actually non-partisan women Obama should be worried about.

Let’s tell Chris Matthews something he doesn’t know: McCain doesn’t necessarily need a friendship with his future VP pick, Bush will probably go to the Olympics, McCain and Powell haven’t talked in months, and things are in the works for Clinton to become governor of New York.

Will McCain pick Rice or a more traditional VP? The consensus is that he’ll go a more traditional route, a sitting Governor most likely. Matthews predicts Senator Thume of South Dakota.

McCain will be a guest on Hardball’s College Tour this Wednesday. Also, make sure to read this fascinating New York Times Magazine profile on Chris Matthews (nytimes.com account needed).

Late Edition With Wolf Blitzer (CNN): Senator Casey (D-PA), who has endorsed Obama, comments on the “bitter” remarks. Thinks it’s “ridiculous to suggest that Obama is elitist”, who was just trying to “express the frustrations that people are feeling about special interests having a stranglehold on our politics”. Says he “knows Obama” and doesn’t think the people of Pennsylvania will solely judge Obama on this statement.

Mike Gravel This Sunday

In Sunday Show Preview on April 11, 2008 at 4:46 pm

Make sure to tune into the show this Sunday, April 13th at 10pm for our interview with former Senator (D-AK) and Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel. Among the topics discussed will be his recently announced run for the Libertarian Party nomination. Join the Facebook event as a reminder and make sure to invite your friends as well.